Live data from Hacker News

For Safer Food, Just Add Viruses

pbs.org

1–10 of 19 posts

Re: For Safer Food, Just Add Viruses

#3
Given that the human digestive tract (reportedly) contains more bacteria than the human body has cells, and they are vital to our survival, how can spraying bacteria-killers on food not be harmful?

Re: For Safer Food, Just Add Viruses

#5
post #3

Given that the human digestive tract (reportedly) contains more bacteria than the human body has cells, and they are vital to our survival, how can spraying bacteria-killers on food not be harmful?

According to this link: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3278644/ phages target specific pathogenic bacteria, and "[...]phages only minimally impact non-target bacteria or body tissues". So that would mean that even though they target bacteria, they would only target a specific bacteria and not all.

Re: For Safer Food, Just Add Viruses

#6
post #3

Given that the human digestive tract (reportedly) contains more bacteria than the human body has cells, and they are vital to our survival, how can spraying bacteria-killers on food not be harmful?

According to this link: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3278644/ phages target specific pathogenic bacteria, and "[...]phages only minimally impact non-target bacteria or body tissues". So that would mean that even though they target bacteria, they would only target a specific bacteria and not all.

Phages will and do target E. Coli and other "pathogenic" bacterium that do in fact reside in your digestive system

Re: For Safer Food, Just Add Viruses

#7
post #3

Given that the human digestive tract (reportedly) contains more bacteria than the human body has cells, and they are vital to our survival, how can spraying bacteria-killers on food not be harmful?

According to this link: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3278644/ phages target specific pathogenic bacteria, and "[...]phages only minimally impact non-target bacteria or body tissues". So that would mean that even though they target bacteria, they would only target a specific bacteria and not all.

You do have to wonder if they aren't over-stating the specificity. The older I get, the more I come to expect the unstated "but..." on claims like that. As the saying goes, "When it's too good to be true, it probably is."

Re: For Safer Food, Just Add Viruses

#10

This was fascinating. Could phages be engineered to attack mrsa and other superbugs we see in hospitals?

It depends.

There are extant phage that predate staph, like Phage K. There are some hurdles you'd need to overcome. Foremost among these is when compared to antibiotics, phage suck for treating disease. This is a big part of the reason everyone beat a path to antibiotics

Phage are extremely narrow spectrum. You can select for a high-fitness phage with serial passages: Plate the host bacterium along with some phage. Find the largest region of dead host (a plaque), pick it and repeat for several hundred generations. The good news is that you'll have a high-fitness phage. The bad news is that it will probably only infect the particular strain of bacteria you've been using to select it. I worked with a fitness optimized E.coli phage that wild-type E.coli probably would have laughed off. I haven't read the therapeutic phage literature, but my assumption would be that you may need to optimize

Phage have some issues with immune clearance. The immune system really loves to eliminate foreign looking viruses. The concentration of phage injected intramusucularly falls very fast. Again, this might be something you can overcome with serial passages. There was some work in rabbits where the authors found an enrichment for mutations in the capsid (the phage's head). I don't recall if they quantified the fitness impact of these mutations.

If I ever get out of software development, it'll probably be to work on phage.

Post reply on HN