Getting Physical - Seagate Kinetic Drive Hardware
swiftstack.com
Getting Physical - Seagate Kinetic Drive Hardware
1–10 of 19 posts
Re: Getting Physical - Seagate Kinetic Drive Hardware
#2Re: Getting Physical - Seagate Kinetic Drive Hardware
#3RAID over IP via broadcast? From a security standpoint, it would seem there are many hurdles to jump. Not too long ago, I talked to Dickinson about what you guys do. I never considered the amount of harddrives necessary to facilitate Swiftstack's goals. Of course the software challenges are interesting, but the amount of hardware and maintaining risk/DR/costs/etc. Oh man. Hats off to you guys.
On the practical side, this means that the drive is "connected" to one or more servers (and can be re-homed on the fly). The storage system itself is responsible for coordinating the communication across the cluster of Kinetic drives. In our case, the coordinating storage system is OpenStack Swift.
On the humorous side, this means that technobabble like "Can you ping the boot record?" or "What does a traceroute to the directory show?" actually sorta make sense now.
Re: Getting Physical - Seagate Kinetic Drive Hardware
#4RAID over IP via broadcast? From a security standpoint, it would seem there are many hurdles to jump. Not too long ago, I talked to Dickinson about what you guys do. I never considered the amount of harddrives necessary to facilitate Swiftstack's goals. Of course the software challenges are interesting, but the amount of hardware and maintaining risk/DR/costs/etc. Oh man. Hats off to you guys.
It's not RAID over IP. Each drive itself is a network endpoint. On the practical side, this means that the drive is "connected" to one or more servers (and can be re-homed on the fly). The storage system itself is responsible for coordinating the communication across the cluster of Kinetic drives. In our case, the coordinating storage system is OpenStack Swift. On the humorous side, this means that technobabble like…
Re: Getting Physical - Seagate Kinetic Drive Hardware
#5Does this not scream "bad idea" to anyone else?
Re: Getting Physical - Seagate Kinetic Drive Hardware
#6Same connector as SAS, but a different pinout? Does this not scream "bad idea" to anyone else?
Is the concern more from an ergonomic perspective, that someone in a data center may plug in a drive into the wrong system?
Re: Getting Physical - Seagate Kinetic Drive Hardware
#7Same connector as SAS, but a different pinout? Does this not scream "bad idea" to anyone else?
Re: Getting Physical - Seagate Kinetic Drive Hardware
#8RAID over IP via broadcast? From a security standpoint, it would seem there are many hurdles to jump. Not too long ago, I talked to Dickinson about what you guys do. I never considered the amount of harddrives necessary to facilitate Swiftstack's goals. Of course the software challenges are interesting, but the amount of hardware and maintaining risk/DR/costs/etc. Oh man. Hats off to you guys.
It's not RAID over IP. Each drive itself is a network endpoint. On the practical side, this means that the drive is "connected" to one or more servers (and can be re-homed on the fly). The storage system itself is responsible for coordinating the communication across the cluster of Kinetic drives. In our case, the coordinating storage system is OpenStack Swift. On the humorous side, this means that technobabble like…
Re: Getting Physical - Seagate Kinetic Drive Hardware
#9Same connector as SAS, but a different pinout? Does this not scream "bad idea" to anyone else?
Re: Getting Physical - Seagate Kinetic Drive Hardware
#10Same connector as SAS, but a different pinout? Does this not scream "bad idea" to anyone else?
Maybe they can/will be making the jack on the drive a unique standard color?