UK to create new cyber defence force
bbc.co.uk
UK to create new cyber defence force
1–10 of 34 posts
Re: UK to create new cyber defence force
#2Re: UK to create new cyber defence force
#3Sort of off-topic, but does it bug anyone else that the militaries and governments of the world continue to refer to 'cyberspace' as if 'cyber-' was current Internet jargon? (Whereas in reality I only see it used for that other thing we are supposed to be making instead of war...)
Cyber is pretty clearly defined among the people who use it. Other words are not.
Re: UK to create new cyber defence force
#4Sort of off-topic, but does it bug anyone else that the militaries and governments of the world continue to refer to 'cyberspace' as if 'cyber-' was current Internet jargon? (Whereas in reality I only see it used for that other thing we are supposed to be making instead of war...)
What other word would you use? Cyber is pretty clearly defined among the people who use it. Other words are not.
Now excuse me as I continue surfing the information super highway!
Re: UK to create new cyber defence force
#5Earlier quoted context omitted.
What other word would you use? Cyber is pretty clearly defined among the people who use it. Other words are not.
Got to admit though, "cyber" sounds very 90s. Now excuse me as I continue surfing the information super highway!
Re: UK to create new cyber defence force
#6Sort of off-topic, but does it bug anyone else that the militaries and governments of the world continue to refer to 'cyberspace' as if 'cyber-' was current Internet jargon? (Whereas in reality I only see it used for that other thing we are supposed to be making instead of war...)
What other word would you use? Cyber is pretty clearly defined among the people who use it. Other words are not.
Maybe the people using these terms (ie, people creating a "defence force" for the UK) should be more in touch with... more current lingo?
Sure would give them at least a vague sense of credibility if they called this something more like an internet/network orientated security... force.
On the otherhand, maybe these people having the massive tell of proclaiming "but this is CYBER." is a good thing? We know to dismiss what ever they're suggesting as uninformed and generally a terrible idea.
Re: UK to create new cyber defence force
#7Earlier quoted context omitted.
What other word would you use? Cyber is pretty clearly defined among the people who use it. Other words are not.
> Cyber is pretty clearly defined among the people who use it. Other words are not. Maybe the people using these terms (ie, people creating a "defence force" for the UK) should be more in touch with... more current lingo? Sure would give them at least a vague sense of credibility if they called this something more like an internet/network orientated security... force. On the otherhand, maybe these people having the m…
What is "more current lingo"?
> an internet/network orientated security... force.
It isn't Internet specific. It isn't just about networking.
Re: UK to create new cyber defence force
#8Fifteen years ago (maybe even ten years ago, depending on which reserve force one joined), you could join the UK reserve forces and the general feeling was that one could easily go a few decades without being mobilised; now, people are told on joining to expect to be mobilised - it's routine.
The US is a very warlike society, with a significant civilian buy-in to the idea of the armed forces and reserve forces. The UK, whilst as a nation just as busy travelling around the world to meet interesting people and shoot at them, does not have nearly such a civilian buy-in; there are already rumblings that reservists are just less attractive to employers on the grounds that they can be expected to disappear for nine months, and the employer is forced to hold their job open for them. This is clearly a big concern for the government, because they're trying to push the idea that employing a reservist brings advantages. Many employers seem... dubious that losing someone for nine months is worth the less tangible benefits.
Some reserve forces are being asked to increase on the order of 50% in about 5 years; given that in the UK it can take three years (and sometimes more - five years isn't unheard of; I understand that in some nations, reservists might spend several weeks or even months doing all the initial training in a single block; that simply won't work in the UK unless civilian attitude to reservists undergoes a massive change) to take a new reserve recruit and make them deployable (on the "trained strength" as the vernacular goes) this is one hell of a recruitment target.
The network infrastructure reservist branches are still in their infancy; in the British navy reserve, the branch is very, very new. They are still working out just what they're about. The kind of IT professional I anticipate they'll be trying to recruit will almost certainly feel a bit ripped off to be exercising their years of experience (for which, as contractors, they probably charge up to a hundred a day) on initial pay which, as I recall, is around 40 UKP a day, before tax etc. The initial basic training and militarisation can easily take a couple of years anyway, before they even start thinking about branching, so this might be something of a hard sell; "join us, and spend two years slogging around fields in the mud, and eventually we'll use your civilian skills at a much lower rate of pay than you get for them in your day job". Given that one of the main selling points of the reserve forces in the UK is that you get to do something a bit different, this is going to be a very hard sell.
Re: UK to create new cyber defence force
#9Sort of off-topic, but does it bug anyone else that the militaries and governments of the world continue to refer to 'cyberspace' as if 'cyber-' was current Internet jargon? (Whereas in reality I only see it used for that other thing we are supposed to be making instead of war...)
What other word would you use? Cyber is pretty clearly defined among the people who use it. Other words are not.
Maybe not a single word, but "technology and information warfare"?
Re: UK to create new cyber defence force
#10Earlier quoted context omitted.
What other word would you use? Cyber is pretty clearly defined among the people who use it. Other words are not.
> Cyber is pretty clearly defined among the people who use it. Other words are not. Maybe the people using these terms (ie, people creating a "defence force" for the UK) should be more in touch with... more current lingo? Sure would give them at least a vague sense of credibility if they called this something more like an internet/network orientated security... force. On the otherhand, maybe these people having the m…
the names Howard bob Howard :-)