Who rooted kernel.org servers two years ago?
arstechnica.com
Who rooted kernel.org servers two years ago?
1–10 of 50 posts
Re: Who rooted kernel.org servers two years ago?
#2The NSA, or related parties, was responsible for the breach. There was an investigation and postmortem, but because of an NSL or other gag-type order, they couldn't accurately publish what they discovered. So they figured that not releasing a report was better than releasing a report that either intentionally misled or pretended not to have figured out what happened.
I know, this is a pretty big leap. But regardless -- what does it mean? What are the ramifications if this is what happened?
Re: Who rooted kernel.org servers two years ago?
#3Re: Who rooted kernel.org servers two years ago?
#4Re: Who rooted kernel.org servers two years ago?
#5Re: Who rooted kernel.org servers two years ago?
#6Re: Who rooted kernel.org servers two years ago?
#7So let's speculate about what the article almost-but-doesn't-quite propose: The NSA, or related parties, was responsible for the breach. There was an investigation and postmortem, but because of an NSL or other gag-type order, they couldn't accurately publish what they discovered. So they figured that not releasing a report was better than releasing a report that either intentionally misled or pretended not to have f…
I strongly suspect they were able to get a copy of the kernel source code... They could be doing anything with it.. Porting it to a new platform.. Compiling it with unsafe GCC flags.. Or worse..
Re: Who rooted kernel.org servers two years ago?
#8OFF-TOPIC why is that when I hit back in Ars it creates about 10 pages in my history (didn't click anything in the page itself) this is an UX nightmare and the 3-4 articles I've looked in the past week made me cringe when trying to leave the page.
Re: Who rooted kernel.org servers two years ago?
#9So let's speculate about what the article almost-but-doesn't-quite propose: The NSA, or related parties, was responsible for the breach. There was an investigation and postmortem, but because of an NSL or other gag-type order, they couldn't accurately publish what they discovered. So they figured that not releasing a report was better than releasing a report that either intentionally misled or pretended not to have f…
https://twitter.com/grahamvsworld/status/375793987992715264
I'd be more curious to see the actual report before speculating.
Re: Who rooted kernel.org servers two years ago?
#10So let's speculate about what the article almost-but-doesn't-quite propose: The NSA, or related parties, was responsible for the breach. There was an investigation and postmortem, but because of an NSL or other gag-type order, they couldn't accurately publish what they discovered. So they figured that not releasing a report was better than releasing a report that either intentionally misled or pretended not to have f…