Design, Composition and Performance [video]
1–10 of 31 posts
Re: Design, Composition and Performance [video]
#2As a former avid Scala developer, I started down the path of watching every Rich Hickey presentation I could find one week. Every video tweaked my thinking just a tad (as I almost always agree with his line of thinking), and I came out of it a better functional programmer and a Clojure developer.
Note: I still do/love Scala, I just develop much less of it in favor of Clojure.
Re: Design, Composition and Performance [video]
#3Re: Design, Composition and Performance [video]
#4Is there a way to see this without compulsory registration?
Re: Design, Composition and Performance [video]
#5Re: Design, Composition and Performance [video]
#6Earlier quoted context omitted.
AFAIK registration isn't required on infoq, and I'm watching it right now.
I see. It seems that if you don't have flash enabled, nothing appears but links for the MP3 and slides, which do require registration.
Re: Design, Composition and Performance [video]
#7Is there a way to see this without compulsory registration?
Re: Design, Composition and Performance [video]
#8video: http://skillsmatter.com/podcast/home/functional-composition
repo: https://github.com/ctford/goldberg
(edited to add the video link)
Re: Design, Composition and Performance [video]
#9Truly a great speaker/thinker, able to communicate his thoughts well. As a former avid Scala developer, I started down the path of watching every Rich Hickey presentation I could find one week. Every video tweaked my thinking just a tad (as I almost always agree with his line of thinking), and I came out of it a better functional programmer and a Clojure developer. Note: I still do/love Scala, I just develop much les…
Re: Design, Composition and Performance [video]
#10A performer who has already mastered one or more musical instruments will be better able to rapidly learn a new one, but a novice is going to need to toil away for years before they reach master-level proficiency. Similarly with programming, I think it is fine for languages to present themselves succinctly for the benefit of experienced developers, but I am highly suspicious of anyone who claims you can learn to program in less than, say, 2 years.
I also think this is something to keep in mind with the recent explosion of "alternative programming schools". You can hand someone a guitar and, in a handful of weeks, teach them all the cords for 10 popular tunes. That person can then find a street corner in the nearest city, set down their open guitar case, and play those ten songs in rotation and make some money...but have we created a new musician?