Researcher controls colleague's motions in 1st human brain-to-brain interface
1–10 of 15 posts
Re: Researcher controls colleague's motions in 1st human brain-to-brain interface
#2Re: Researcher controls colleague's motions in 1st human brain-to-brain interface
#3Re: Researcher controls colleague's motions in 1st human brain-to-brain interface
#4Yeah I'm sure the internet is a great place in which to plug our brains, what with all the collection going on. Last thing I want is for all this nightmare to become unopt-out-able.
>But Rao cautioned this technology only reads certain kinds of simple brain signals, not a person’s thoughts. And it doesn’t give anyone the ability to control your actions against your will.
Both researchers were in the lab wearing highly specialized equipment and under ideal conditions. They also had to obtain and follow a stringent set of international human-subject testing rules to conduct the demonstration.
“I think some people will be unnerved by this because they will overestimate the technology,” Prat said. “There’s no possible way the technology that we have could be used on a person unknowingly or without their willing participation.”
I for one am tired of seeing some exciting advancement come out of research and then having someone pooh-pooh it out of ignorance. Think of the positive places this could go!
Re: Researcher controls colleague's motions in 1st human brain-to-brain interface
#5Yeah I'm sure the internet is a great place in which to plug our brains, what with all the collection going on. Last thing I want is for all this nightmare to become unopt-out-able.
Did you even read the article before your cynical slagging on the tech? > But Rao cautioned this technology only reads certain kinds of simple brain signals, not a person’s thoughts. And it doesn’t give anyone the ability to control your actions against your will. Both researchers were in the lab wearing highly specialized equipment and under ideal conditions. They also had to obtain and follow a stringent set of int…
My first thought reading it was that some coma patients could finally 'talk' to their loved ones and doctors (e.g., http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1230092/Rom-Houben-P... ).
My second thought was wondering whether we could crowd-source the origin. For example, multiple people sending commands, with the majority command being acted upon. Creepy, but potentially cool (I'm not sure what this says about me.).
My third thought was wondering whether the receiver would develop 'muscle memory' of the actions taken. In other words, could the receiver learn how to do certain movements.
Re: Researcher controls colleague's motions in 1st human brain-to-brain interface
#6Re: Researcher controls colleague's motions in 1st human brain-to-brain interface
#7Re: Researcher controls colleague's motions in 1st human brain-to-brain interface
#8Re: Researcher controls colleague's motions in 1st human brain-to-brain interface
#9I always assumed we'd have private spaceships before we could decode the brain well enough to do something like this. Wow!
Re: Researcher controls colleague's motions in 1st human brain-to-brain interface
#10There was an action/sci-fi movie called Gamer a few years ago that briefly explored this kind of technology. I was still fascinated by what the script writers came up with - people whose job was to be real-world second life characters, prison inmates who were real-world bodies in a COD modern warfare style game called Slayers, and of course people committing crimes.