Bash Configurations Demystified
dghubble.com
Bash Configurations Demystified
1–10 of 22 posts
Re: Bash Configurations Demystified
#2Re: Bash Configurations Demystified
#3See " rel="nofollow">http://blog.flowblok.id.au/2013-02/shell-startup-scripts.htm... , the most comprehensive overview I've encountered to date.
Re: Bash Configurations Demystified
#4See " rel="nofollow">http://blog.flowblok.id.au/2013-02/shell-startup-scripts.htm... , the most comprehensive overview I've encountered to date.
^ broken link.
Edit: Not that I recommend the resource, just fixed the link for you.
Re: Bash Configurations Demystified
#5See " rel="nofollow">http://blog.flowblok.id.au/2013-02/shell-startup-scripts.htm... , the most comprehensive overview I've encountered to date.
^ broken link.
Alternatively reproduced here without the '>': http://blog.flowblok.id.au/2013-02/shell-startup-scripts.htm...
Re: Bash Configurations Demystified
#6Re: Bash Configurations Demystified
#7What's the reason for all the files, and why do I care whether my shell is a login or non-login? To me, no matter where I get my shell from (whether VT, SSH, gnome-terminal), I want all my aliases, settings and nice terminal colors to be there.
In ubuntu that's stuff like the load average of the machine or whether or not there are packages that need to be upgraded.
Re: Bash Configurations Demystified
#8You can also rename .profile to .bash_profile on Ubuntu and Debian. All other distros that I've encountered set up .bash_profile by default.
Re: Bash Configurations Demystified
#9What's the reason for all the files, and why do I care whether my shell is a login or non-login? To me, no matter where I get my shell from (whether VT, SSH, gnome-terminal), I want all my aliases, settings and nice terminal colors to be there.