Live data from Hacker News

Five Years of Stackoverflow.com

stum.de

1–10 of 62 posts

Re: Five Years of Stackoverflow.com

#2
I used to be a heavy stackoverflow user in the early days, and I have enough karma to put me in the moderator tier now. However, I don't use the site much anymore, except for getting questions answered.

In a way I suppose that's a testament to the fact that the site still works, and works well. They solved most of the problem they set out to solve originally, which is a major achievement. Nevertheless, I still have a nagging feeling that some further iterative improvements could turn stackoverflow into something that would be even more useful, and would be more inviting for people to continue to participate in actively even without having expert knowledge in some tiny sub-category or a desire to constantly tidy everything up day-in day-out.

Edit: to clarify I mean that it's hard to visit stackoverflow on a regular basis instead of just using it as an answer generating machine. Which I think is something not unique to myself and probably hurts the overall quality of the site considerably, notwithstanding the many experts who use the site heavily. Specifically I find it hard to peruse interesting topics to comment on, since the site is now very aggressively tightly focused. Even worse I find it difficult to use the site as a learning tool. Often times when I want to learn something new I'll get it in my head to go to stackoverflow first, but that's never worked very well for me. It's just too difficult to sort or filter all the data into something that is actually useful.

Overall I think the biggest problem is that the people behind the site(s) have decided they've done their jobs, that what they've presented is good enough and at most needs only minor tweaking. I think that's a huge mistake personally and I think the result is going to be that the stackexchange sites end up as a footnote in history after having been rapidly eclipsed by "the next big thing" in a similar vein.

Re: Five Years of Stackoverflow.com

#3
You need to edit at least a certain number of characters (might be 6). So if you want to correct a = into a == you can't. Well, you can... you have to make a few other bogus changes. This bugs me.

Re: Five Years of Stackoverflow.com

#5
A fantastic site that has helped me immensely. It's a little hard to gain reputation so much now, due to the amount of people who jump in as soon as a question is asked. But the vast database of answers to common problems it has created have added immense value. I much prefer using SO rather than dedicated forums which are often badly designed and slow e.g. Oracle, IBM.

Some of the other sites that SO spawned are useful too e.g. I like reading the English language stack exchange. There is definitely room for both Quora and the Stack Exchange sites on the Internet (Quora more subjective and discussion based, whereas Stack Exchange sites I use for more definitive / right or wrong answers).

Re: Five Years of Stackoverflow.com

#7
Raising my glass to stackoverflow! It had done more to improve my productivity than anything else. Jeff Atwood and the whole community have changed the world for the better. Why is it that stackoverflow is so much more useful than expertsexchange or quora?
Post reply on HN