Deploying a Web app in 14 days, No HTML
korynunn.wordpress.com
Deploying a Web app in 14 days, No HTML
1–10 of 10 posts
Re: Deploying a Web app in 14 days, No HTML
#2Re: Deploying a Web app in 14 days, No HTML
#3Hey, I was the lead dev on this, will answer questions.
Re: Deploying a Web app in 14 days, No HTML
#4Hey, I was the lead dev on this, will answer questions.
The Article says that HTML is a derivative of XML. IIRC, HTML comes from SGML not from XML. And SGML is definitely made with being written directly by a human in mind.
Whether HTML was intended for humans or not, it isn't in my opinion a particularly nice way to develop applications. Don't get me wrong, I love web applications, but writing them with HTML isn't a requirement.
Re: Deploying a Web app in 14 days, No HTML
#5HTML is data. It has value in not requiring programmers to write it. Instead it can be written by designers, or generated by other programs, including visual tools. Yes, code can also be generated by tools, but writing code to generate code is a more difficult task than writing code to generate data. Except for Lisp of course, where code and data are the same.
Re: Deploying a Web app in 14 days, No HTML
#6Code requires a programmer to design, write, and maintain. Sometimes writing code is necessary, but often all that is needed is simple data, not complex code. HTML is data. It has value in not requiring programmers to write it. Instead it can be written by designers, or generated by other programs, including visual tools. Yes, code can also be generated by tools, but writing code to generate code is a more difficult…
Re: Deploying a Web app in 14 days, No HTML
#7Hey, I was the lead dev on this, will answer questions.
Re: Deploying a Web app in 14 days, No HTML
#8Re: Deploying a Web app in 14 days, No HTML
#9One thing I would love to hear more is how do you deal with CSS? If everything is generated on client, do I need to "reverse engineer" using inspector?
Re: Deploying a Web app in 14 days, No HTML
#10Earlier quoted context omitted.
The Article says that HTML is a derivative of XML. IIRC, HTML comes from SGML not from XML. And SGML is definitely made with being written directly by a human in mind.
True, perhaps a better description would be that HTML is a sibling to XML. Whether HTML was intended for humans or not, it isn't in my opinion a particularly nice way to develop applications. Don't get me wrong, I love web applications, but writing them with HTML isn't a requirement.
Btw, Gaffa sounds like a nice idea, definitely interested on how it plays out in the future.