Bootstrap 3 is mobile-first
github.com
Bootstrap 3 is mobile-first
1–10 of 30 posts
Re: Bootstrap 3 is mobile-first
#2It's also dropping IE7 and FF3.6 support. I'm glad they'll be hosting versioned docs as Bootstrap 2.x is going to be in use for a good while longer.
Re: Bootstrap 3 is mobile-first
#3Going handheld first and dropping older browsers? Good to know they're following the path that Foundation took.
Re: Bootstrap 3 is mobile-first
#4I know it isn't really a big thing, but this is really going to cramp my style:
"Instead of .span and .offset, we're now using .col-span- and .col-offset-."
I can blaze through views using .row & .span in HAML, not so much now. I envision tons of personal errors in the short term as I transition projects to BS3.
===========
Issue #2, does anyone know why Glyphicons won out over Font Awesome? ( http://fortawesome.github.io/Font-Awesome/ ) Isn't Glyphicons only free in .png? I'm kinda confused about how the licensing works here: http://glyphicons.com/
===========
Issue #3 [This is under the modal section...] This sounds like a bad idea, I personally don't have an ios3/4 device handy, but someone should be on that for something as big as bootstrap:
"Test on iOS5. Not sure if we need to go older, but I want to check here to see how well fixed is supported."
Re: Bootstrap 3 is mobile-first
#5I know it isn't really a big thing, but this is really going to cramp my style: "Instead of .span and .offset, we're now using .col-span- and .col-offset-." I can blaze through views using .row & .span in HAML, not so much now. I envision tons of personal errors in the short term as I transition projects to BS3. =========== Issue #2, does anyone know why Glyphicons won out over Font Awesome? ( http://fortawesome.gith…
Wow that is a terrible change, I hope they back that out.
Re: Bootstrap 3 is mobile-first
#6It's also dropping IE7 and FF3.6 support. I'm glad they'll be hosting versioned docs as Bootstrap 2.x is going to be in use for a good while longer.
There's also http://www.bootstrapdocs.com
Re: Bootstrap 3 is mobile-first
#7I know it isn't really a big thing, but this is really going to cramp my style: "Instead of .span and .offset, we're now using .col-span- and .col-offset-." I can blaze through views using .row & .span in HAML, not so much now. I envision tons of personal errors in the short term as I transition projects to BS3. =========== Issue #2, does anyone know why Glyphicons won out over Font Awesome? ( http://fortawesome.gith…
About Glyphicons
From Bootstrap docs (http://twitter.github.io/bootstrap/base-css.html#icons):
"Glyphicons Halflings are normally not available for free, but an arrangement between Bootstrap and the Glyphicons creators have made this possible at no cost to you as developers. As a thank you, we ask you to include an optional link back to Glyphicons whenever practical."
Re: Bootstrap 3 is mobile-first
#8I know it isn't really a big thing, but this is really going to cramp my style: "Instead of .span and .offset, we're now using .col-span- and .col-offset-." I can blaze through views using .row & .span in HAML, not so much now. I envision tons of personal errors in the short term as I transition projects to BS3. =========== Issue #2, does anyone know why Glyphicons won out over Font Awesome? ( http://fortawesome.gith…
Glyphicons provides a special license for bootstrap.
I assume the publicity/business that bootstrap drives to glyphicons must be well worth giving away part of their paid product.
Re: Bootstrap 3 is mobile-first
#9I know it isn't really a big thing, but this is really going to cramp my style: "Instead of .span and .offset, we're now using .col-span- and .col-offset-." I can blaze through views using .row & .span in HAML, not so much now. I envision tons of personal errors in the short term as I transition projects to BS3. =========== Issue #2, does anyone know why Glyphicons won out over Font Awesome? ( http://fortawesome.gith…
I didn't think fontawesome was around when bootstrap started, but I'd think now it'd be better to bundle fontawesome instead - more icons and they're scalable; that's been my experience of why FA>GI.
Re: Bootstrap 3 is mobile-first
#10Forget about "mobile-first", this is probably the best part of Bootstrap 3:
Refactor components to be more mixin-friendly.
Honestly, Bootstrap will really benefit from being easier to fit into your own markup, rather than forcing your markup to fit Bootstrap. I mean: that's what CSS is kinda all about.