Web Framework Benchmarks Round 5
techempower.com
Web Framework Benchmarks Round 5
1–10 of 58 posts
Re: Web Framework Benchmarks Round 5
#2Re: Web Framework Benchmarks Round 5
#3Re: Web Framework Benchmarks Round 5
#4The blog post links to Round 4 results. I can't find Round 5 results anywhere
Re: Web Framework Benchmarks Round 5
#5The blog post links to Round 4 results. I can't find Round 5 results anywhere
If you don't see Round 5 at first, just hit reload. It should appear.
Re: Web Framework Benchmarks Round 5
#6The default JSON serializer is hopelessly slow.
Re: Web Framework Benchmarks Round 5
#7You should really do a test on ASP.NET with JSON.net and ServiceStack Text. The default JSON serializer is hopelessly slow.
I need to be clear that the ASP.NET implementation that you see in Round 5 was contributed by user @pdonald at Github.
That said, we'd be happy to receive more pull requests with ASP.NET changes and improvements. We suspect there is a lot of room for improvement in the Windows numbers.
Re: Web Framework Benchmarks Round 5
#8Re: Web Framework Benchmarks Round 5
#9You should really do a test on ASP.NET with JSON.net and ServiceStack Text. The default JSON serializer is hopelessly slow.
Thanks for the tip! I need to be clear that the ASP.NET implementation that you see in Round 5 was contributed by user @pdonald at Github. That said, we'd be happy to receive more pull requests with ASP.NET changes and improvements. We suspect there is a lot of room for improvement in the Windows numbers.
Re: Web Framework Benchmarks Round 5
#10OpenResty is twice as fast as raw Go at multiple queries DB test (dedicated hardware), huh.