Intel i7-4770k overclocked to 8.0 GHz
tomshardware.com
Intel i7-4770k overclocked to 8.0 GHz
1–10 of 13 posts
Re: Intel i7-4770k overclocked to 8.0 GHz
#2I know that FSB speeds are irrelevant now more than ever with multithreading and multi-core architectures, but the performance afforded by high-clock chips in high-demand areas, along with multi-core technology, it seems could be far greater than it is now.
Especially with several 8GHz nodes, it seems like cheaper supercomputing could be more viable.
Am I wrong, right, misguided, inaccurate, incorrect?
Re: Intel i7-4770k overclocked to 8.0 GHz
#3I'm a bit saddened that nearly ten years after we reached 3GHz, desktop clock speed increase has come to a halt. I know that FSB speeds are irrelevant now more than ever with multithreading and multi-core architectures, but the performance afforded by high-clock chips in high-demand areas, along with multi-core technology, it seems could be far greater than it is now. Especially with several 8GHz nodes, it seems like…
Re: Intel i7-4770k overclocked to 8.0 GHz
#4I'm a bit saddened that nearly ten years after we reached 3GHz, desktop clock speed increase has come to a halt. I know that FSB speeds are irrelevant now more than ever with multithreading and multi-core architectures, but the performance afforded by high-clock chips in high-demand areas, along with multi-core technology, it seems could be far greater than it is now. Especially with several 8GHz nodes, it seems like…
Re: Intel i7-4770k overclocked to 8.0 GHz
#5I'm a bit saddened that nearly ten years after we reached 3GHz, desktop clock speed increase has come to a halt. I know that FSB speeds are irrelevant now more than ever with multithreading and multi-core architectures, but the performance afforded by high-clock chips in high-demand areas, along with multi-core technology, it seems could be far greater than it is now. Especially with several 8GHz nodes, it seems like…
Re: Intel i7-4770k overclocked to 8.0 GHz
#6I'm a bit saddened that nearly ten years after we reached 3GHz, desktop clock speed increase has come to a halt. I know that FSB speeds are irrelevant now more than ever with multithreading and multi-core architectures, but the performance afforded by high-clock chips in high-demand areas, along with multi-core technology, it seems could be far greater than it is now. Especially with several 8GHz nodes, it seems like…
Re: Intel i7-4770k overclocked to 8.0 GHz
#7I'm a bit saddened that nearly ten years after we reached 3GHz, desktop clock speed increase has come to a halt. I know that FSB speeds are irrelevant now more than ever with multithreading and multi-core architectures, but the performance afforded by high-clock chips in high-demand areas, along with multi-core technology, it seems could be far greater than it is now. Especially with several 8GHz nodes, it seems like…
Clock speed hasn't increased, but instructions per second per core has more than doubled over the last decade, and instructions per clock cycle per core continues to increase ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instructions_per_second ). Slower than Moore's law, but it's something.
Re: Intel i7-4770k overclocked to 8.0 GHz
#8Re: Intel i7-4770k overclocked to 8.0 GHz
#9I'm a bit saddened that nearly ten years after we reached 3GHz, desktop clock speed increase has come to a halt. I know that FSB speeds are irrelevant now more than ever with multithreading and multi-core architectures, but the performance afforded by high-clock chips in high-demand areas, along with multi-core technology, it seems could be far greater than it is now. Especially with several 8GHz nodes, it seems like…
Clock speeds have been irrelevant ever since there has been more than one architecture for the same instruction set. You cannot compare a 3GHz i7 with a 3GHz Pentium 4 of equal core count and say that, just because the clock is ticking at the same speed, Intel isn't doing enough to improve performance. There would be a vast effective difference in just about every kind of workload, just due to architecture improvements.
Re: Intel i7-4770k overclocked to 8.0 GHz
#10I'm skeptical. I don't know the exact breakpoint, but pushing enough power through the small (and very dense) circuits of a processor can't go beyond a certain level based on our current CPU cooling technology. The heat at that density just becomes too high and too localized.