Live data from Hacker News

Circuits.io is growing up – multi-layered PCBs and more

blog.circuits.io

1–10 of 24 posts

Re: Circuits.io is growing up – multi-layered PCBs and more

#3
post #2

Anyone know what the business model is here? How can I expect to be monetised once I'm tied in?

Hi Michael

We just hope you will order your boards through circuits.io :), but we will not tie you in. You can download your gerbers and have your board produced elsewhere.

Karel

Re: Circuits.io is growing up – multi-layered PCBs and more

#7
post #6

After Tinkercad shutting down, I would be wary of tying my workflow (or investing my time in learning) into software I didn't own. Not trying to spread FUD or anything, but it seems risky.

While I agree that all users are taking the risk you describe, I think they reason they are using the website at all is the hope that an online tool will increase productivity via features only an online tool could be expected to have. That trade-off might be unavoidable.

Re: Circuits.io is growing up – multi-layered PCBs and more

#8
This is some really cool software. I have just finished my first boards with eagle and open sourced them. Alas I absolutely hated Eagle, but getting mercy for Linux users is a miracle in of itself ;(

If anyone gives a shit my boards are here. https://bitbucket.org/TheLegace/yurt_motordrive-hardware

Re: Circuits.io is growing up – multi-layered PCBs and more

#9

I have wanted to dabble in making my own PCBs and I have always wondered about the steps beyond the PCB. As in, is there a good small-run manufacturer for doing the pick and place of the components?

This guy used such a service and tells about it in his blog.

http://www.reddit.com/r/ECE/comments/1cfuk3/making_55_of_som...

Re: Circuits.io is growing up – multi-layered PCBs and more

#10
post #6

After Tinkercad shutting down, I would be wary of tying my workflow (or investing my time in learning) into software I didn't own. Not trying to spread FUD or anything, but it seems risky.

While I agree that all users are taking the risk you describe, I think they reason they are using the website at all is the hope that an online tool will increase productivity via features only an online tool could be expected to have. That trade-off might be unavoidable.

What are those features?
Post reply on HN