Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

A NAT64 implementation for Linux

github.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

1–6 of 6 posts

Re: A NAT64 implementation for Linux

#2

Post by jcr »

This looks interesting. Thanks for submitting it.

The first (that I know of) NAT64 implementation was in OpenBSD 5.1 release and there's support in the default firewall/packet filter (pf). I think FreeBSD has this code working as well, but I'm not sure, and I'm too lazy to check.

Here are some OpenBSD 5.1 release NAT64 details:

http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/NAT64-OpenBSD-5-1-wil...

The following talk on NAT64 is a bit old (2010) but good

http://www.bsdcan.org/2010/schedule/events/197.en.html

Re: A NAT64 implementation for Linux

#4

Post by jcr »

wmf wrote: post #3

If you're considering NAT64, look at Dual Stack Lite since it's more compatible.

I haven't read RFC6333 yet, so I don't grasp Dual Stack Lite, but could you provide some details on why you feel it's "more compatible"? Thanks!

Re: A NAT64 implementation for Linux

#5

Post by marios »

jcr wrote: post #2

This looks interesting. Thanks for submitting it. The first (that I know of) NAT64 implementation was in OpenBSD 5.1 release and there's support in the default firewall/packet filter (pf). I think FreeBSD has this code working as well, but I'm not sure, and I'm too lazy to check. Here are some OpenBSD 5.1 release NAT64 details: http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/NAT64-OpenBSD-5-1-wil... The following talk on NAT6…

I find it ironic that the h-online was 'corrected' following a reader's comment ("IPv4 host can not initiate a connection with a IPv6 only host with NAT64"). This is actually false. The NAT64 gateway _can_ do this, provided you have configured it correctly. I found this http://home.nuug.no/~peter/pf/eurobsdcon2012/nat64.html quite helpful, as well as a post on the mailing list [1] describing commong scenarios. Of course, the pf.conf manpage describes with all the details, but that should go without saying :-)

[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/misc@openbsd.org/msg107255.html

Re: A NAT64 implementation for Linux

#6

Post by wmf »

jcr wrote: post #4
wmf wrote: post #3

If you're considering NAT64, look at Dual Stack Lite since it's more compatible.

I haven't read RFC6333 yet, so I don't grasp Dual Stack Lite, but could you provide some details on why you feel it's "more compatible"? Thanks!

IPv4-only hosts like Windows XP[1], game consoles, and all embedded devices don't work with NAT64. You can do some kind of NAT464, but that's kludgier than DS-Lite.

[1] Doesn't do DNS over IPv6, so can't operate in a IPv6-only environment.

Post reply on HN