.NET Micro ORM Review - FluentData
codecognition.org
.NET Micro ORM Review - FluentData
1–10 of 16 posts
Re: .NET Micro ORM Review - FluentData
#2Re: .NET Micro ORM Review - FluentData
#3On a more serious note, FluentData is a wheel reinvented, square. PetaPoco anyone?
Re: .NET Micro ORM Review - FluentData
#4What's the point of this when you have EF?
Re: .NET Micro ORM Review - FluentData
#5What's the point of this when you have EF?
Dapper has been very useful at my current gig and more innovation in that space the better. Okay these micro-ORMs lack fundamentals like identity maps and caching but do you always need these features?
Inertia is dangerous.
Re: .NET Micro ORM Review - FluentData
#6What's the point of this when you have EF?
Doesn't it suck?
Plus, if its good enough for the Stack Exchange team, then its plenty good enough for me.
Re: .NET Micro ORM Review - FluentData
#7Re: .NET Micro ORM Review - FluentData
#8Earlier quoted context omitted.
Doesn't it suck?
No, Dapper does not suck. I too have been using Dapper at our company recently and its been an incredible boon to our db performance and code readability. Plus, if its good enough for the Stack Exchange team, then its plenty good enough for me.
Re: .NET Micro ORM Review - FluentData
#9Re: .NET Micro ORM Review - FluentData
#10Exhibit A: Yet another proof for having three obligatory pieces of software for every beginning programmer: an ORM, a blog engine and a CMS. On a more serious note, FluentData is a wheel reinvented, square. PetaPoco anyone?
I like Peta because it's the smallest most minimal ORM I've found. I can grasp most of what it's doing after little work with it and it's fast enough for me though I'm definitely not pushing it too hard.