Three Things You May Not Get About the Aaron Swartz Case

#1

Post by Bluem00 » Mon, Mar 25, 2013, 4:12 AM UTC

Three Things You May Not Get About the Aaron Swartz Case
popehat.com

Re: Three Things You May Not Get About the Aaron Swartz Case

#2

Post by Indyan » Mon, Mar 25, 2013, 6:55 AM UTC

This is what I get: "You have been banned. You might have been banned because you are a spammer. You might have been banned because you're a troll of some sort. You might have been banned out of sheer malice. Perhaps you just caught one of us on a bad day. If you believe that you have been banned unjustly, drop us a line.

Rex non potest peccare!" And this is the first time I am visiting this site.

Re: Three Things You May Not Get About the Aaron Swartz Case

#3

Post by pasbesoin » Tue, Mar 26, 2013, 1:11 AM UTC

This deserves to be read.

Re: Three Things You May Not Get About the Aaron Swartz Case

#4

Post by pasbesoin » Tue, Mar 26, 2013, 1:13 AM UTC

Indyan wrote: post #2

This is what I get: "You have been banned. You might have been banned because you are a spammer. You might have been banned because you're a troll of some sort. You might have been banned out of sheer malice. Perhaps you just caught one of us on a bad day. If you believe that you have been banned unjustly, drop us a line. Rex non potest peccare!" And this is the first time I am visiting this site.

I had no such problem. Nor have I ever had a problem with Ken's site.

That said, Google cache is an easy workaround:

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http%3A...