Why Visual Basic is (supposedly) better than C#
simple-talk.com
Why Visual Basic is (supposedly) better than C#
1–10 of 51 posts
Re: Why Visual Basic is (supposedly) better than C#
#2And comparing "&&" and "and"? Really?
Re: Why Visual Basic is (supposedly) better than C#
#3Oh what a piece of BS. Yet another shallow, mechanical comparison of tiny "features" and IDE peculiarities with no other purpose in life other than initiating a decade-old flamewar. And comparing "&&" and "and"? Really?
Re: Why Visual Basic is (supposedly) better than C#
#4Re: Why Visual Basic is (supposedly) better than C#
#5Oh what a piece of BS. Yet another shallow, mechanical comparison of tiny "features" and IDE peculiarities with no other purpose in life other than initiating a decade-old flamewar. And comparing "&&" and "and"? Really?
wait, the article is not sarcasm? I thought the site is some kind of the Onion for programmers?
Re: Why Visual Basic is (supposedly) better than C#
#6Re: Why Visual Basic is (supposedly) better than C#
#7One reason VB has such a stigma attached to it is because it's common to see it written by non-developers, particularly lurking in excel as some background macro. Anyone can butcher any language - it's just a matter of preference. Anyone who touts a language so strongly has clearly lost the purpose of having it and is not worth debating with.
Re: Why Visual Basic is (supposedly) better than C#
#8[deleted]