Live data from Hacker News

Amazon RedShift vs. local PostgreSQL

rarestblog.com

1–10 of 34 posts

Re: Amazon RedShift vs. local PostgreSQL

#5
post #4

I'd like to see some more information about the local setup, including hardware and the postgresql.conf. Otherwise, this tells me very little in terms of comparison.

In anyway this test won't tell you much, just how different systems behave to bigger load.

The local setup was quite usual: PostgreSQL 9.2, Mint 13, default conf in VirtualBox in iMac i5 12GB. (read: home computer, no tuning)

For me the result is that mostly RedShift is on par with local PostgreSQL, sometimes even winning for Also the big deal was that RedShift scaled linearly.

Re: Amazon RedShift vs. local PostgreSQL

#8
This is a pretty interesting. I wonder how query performance differs between Redshift and local PostgreSQL for other types of benchmarks as well, say TPC-H queries. (And I guess how Redshift scales out as the dataset size increases in TPC-H.)
Post reply on HN