Is science merely fiction?
quantumdiaries.org
Is science merely fiction?
1–7 of 7 posts
Re: Is science merely fiction?
#2Re: Is science merely fiction?
#3That stuff roughly occured to me in my youth.. that you probably cannot fully know and describe a system while being part of it. I don't find that depressing at all. Sure there is a reality, maybe it is internally consistent; there's just no way from fiction leading to there. We can build imperfect models of the shadows on the wall of the cave; we can't even make imperfect models of all of reality. It's like trying to make sense of a piece of code, give a definite answer, without knowing the code that comes before and after it... it won't ever happen, you can guess as long as you want, you can never fully confirm or deny your model. Don't get used to, don't identify with that house of cards, and there is nothing depressing about blowing it away.
Re: Is science merely fiction?
#4A model is not a reality is the one of today. Look at all that "economy", "psychology", "nutrition" nonsense. These models are so weak and artificial, they are not even good-enough for considering "as if".)
Re: Is science merely fiction?
#5 "The map is not the territory"
and "All models are wrong; some are useful."Re: Is science merely fiction?
#6As far as I can tell, this can be summed up in the two aphorisms "The map is not the territory" and "All models are wrong; some are useful."