Wolfram|Alpha Is Coming
blog.wolfram.com
Wolfram|Alpha Is Coming
1–10 of 39 posts
Re: Wolfram|Alpha Is Coming
#2Re: Wolfram|Alpha Is Coming
#3Re: Wolfram|Alpha Is Coming
#4I wonder if this is actually going to work, or if it's going to be like every other failed attempt at this kind of thing - ie amusing at first but far too limited to be genuinely useful.
"But what about all the actual knowledge that we as humans have accumulated? A lot of it is now on the web—in billions of pages of text. And with search engines, we can very efficiently search for specific terms and phrases in that text. But we can’t compute from that. And in effect, we can only answer questions that have been literally asked before. We can look things up, but we can’t figure anything new out. So how can we deal with that? Well, some people have thought the way forward must be to somehow automatically understand the natural language that exists on the web. Perhaps getting the web semantically tagged to make that easier. But armed with Mathematica and NKS I realized there’s another way: explicitly implement methods and models, as algorithms, and explicitly curate all data so that it is immediately computable."
(eg, the crucial formula is algorithms to compute further information from curated, trusted data)
Re: Wolfram|Alpha Is Coming
#5Re: Wolfram|Alpha Is Coming
#6Re: Wolfram|Alpha Is Coming
#7I wonder if this is actually going to work, or if it's going to be like every other failed attempt at this kind of thing - ie amusing at first but far too limited to be genuinely useful.
the difference in approach is outlined in the following paragraphs: "But what about all the actual knowledge that we as humans have accumulated? A lot of it is now on the web—in billions of pages of text. And with search engines, we can very efficiently search for specific terms and phrases in that text. But we can’t compute from that. And in effect, we can only answer questions that have been literally asked before.…
Re: Wolfram|Alpha Is Coming
#8Re: Wolfram|Alpha Is Coming
#9Earlier quoted context omitted.
the difference in approach is outlined in the following paragraphs: "But what about all the actual knowledge that we as humans have accumulated? A lot of it is now on the web—in billions of pages of text. And with search engines, we can very efficiently search for specific terms and phrases in that text. But we can’t compute from that. And in effect, we can only answer questions that have been literally asked before.…
so he scripted google and fed it all into a learning algorithm?
(google has pretty much admitted it does a horrible job with structured information...)