San Francisco’s minimum wage will rise again to $10.55
sfexaminer.com
San Francisco’s minimum wage will rise again to $10.55
1–6 of 6 posts
Re: San Francisco’s minimum wage will rise again to $10.55
#2This whole situation reminds me of the "B Ark" from Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. A whole planet schemed to get rid of people they felt were in useless jobs (e.g. telephone cleaners, and hair dressers). If the minimum wage in SF is now $10.55, who will sweep the floors?
In the story, the rest of the planet was soon wiped out by a telephone-born virus or something :)
Re: San Francisco’s minimum wage will rise again to $10.55
#3"voters approved a local ordinance tying the minimum wage to the regional rate of inflation" Isn't inflation naturally affected by wages (among other things)? So this creates a feedback loop driving inflation upward. This whole situation reminds me of the "B Ark" from Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. A whole planet schemed to get rid of people they felt were in useless jobs (e.g. telephone cleaners, and hair dresser…
Re: San Francisco’s minimum wage will rise again to $10.55
#4"voters approved a local ordinance tying the minimum wage to the regional rate of inflation" Isn't inflation naturally affected by wages (among other things)? So this creates a feedback loop driving inflation upward. This whole situation reminds me of the "B Ark" from Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. A whole planet schemed to get rid of people they felt were in useless jobs (e.g. telephone cleaners, and hair dresser…
Robots, doh!
Re: San Francisco’s minimum wage will rise again to $10.55
#5Earlier quoted context omitted.
Robots, doh!
No, the same people that do it today. Only difference is they'll get paid 3% more per hour.
So, it won't be the same people. There will be fewer teenagers in the workforce.
Re: San Francisco’s minimum wage will rise again to $10.55
#6Earlier quoted context omitted.
No, the same people that do it today. Only difference is they'll get paid 3% more per hour.
FTA: "The study by economist Aaron Yelowitz concludes that earlier studies failed to recognize groups who are losing out on work opportunities because of the higher labor cost — specifically teenagers." So, it won't be the same people. There will be fewer teenagers in the workforce.