GrapheneOS Overhauled Default Apps and Secure Clipboard
grapheneos.social
GrapheneOS Overhauled Default Apps and Secure Clipboard
1–10 of 283 posts
Re: GrapheneOS Overhauled Default Apps and Secure Clipboard
#2https://xcancel.com/GrapheneOS/status/2096677808424788256#m
https://nitter.click/GrapheneOS/status/2096677808424788256#m
https://bsky.app/profile/grapheneos.org/post/3muun5c4fdc2o
Secure paste:
https://xcancel.com/GrapheneOS/status/2096685327020933355#m
https://nitter.click/GrapheneOS/status/2096685327020933355#m
Re: GrapheneOS Overhauled Default Apps and Secure Clipboard
#3I don't really get why so many Americans want RCS to succeed though. Do you guys not remember when carriers charged 10p/text? Why on earth would you want to give any power at all back to those people?
Re: GrapheneOS Overhauled Default Apps and Secure Clipboard
#4Except... what carriers still remain using their own RCS carrier services and haven't been pressured by Google to adopt Jive?
Re: GrapheneOS Overhauled Default Apps and Secure Clipboard
#5Re: GrapheneOS Overhauled Default Apps and Secure Clipboard
#6 > RCS isn't an open platform in practice. It isn't even as open as SMS/MMS. It heavily depends on proprietary Google and carrier infrastructure in practice. We can start by replicating Google's approach and then we can work on only using carrier services for carriers where it's actually supported.
What is the point of RCS though? It seems to be strictly inferior to Signal. It seems a Google product meant to serve Google. I wouldn't hate it if GrapheneOS would totally ignore RCS. I fail to see any value in it, but maybe I am lacking information(?)Re: GrapheneOS Overhauled Default Apps and Secure Clipboard
#7Very good idea! Google abandoned these long ago. I don't really get why so many Americans want RCS to succeed though. Do you guys not remember when carriers charged 10p/text? Why on earth would you want to give any power at all back to those people?
Re: GrapheneOS Overhauled Default Apps and Secure Clipboard
#8> RCS isn't an open platform in practice. It isn't even as open as SMS/MMS. It heavily depends on proprietary Google and carrier infrastructure in practice. We can start by replicating Google's approach and then we can work on only using carrier services for carriers where it's actually supported. What is the point of RCS though? It seems to be strictly inferior to Signal. It seems a Google product meant to serve Goo…
Re: GrapheneOS Overhauled Default Apps and Secure Clipboard
#9Very good idea! Google abandoned these long ago. I don't really get why so many Americans want RCS to succeed though. Do you guys not remember when carriers charged 10p/text? Why on earth would you want to give any power at all back to those people?
Re: GrapheneOS Overhauled Default Apps and Secure Clipboard
#10> RCS isn't an open platform in practice. It isn't even as open as SMS/MMS. It heavily depends on proprietary Google and carrier infrastructure in practice. We can start by replicating Google's approach and then we can work on only using carrier services for carriers where it's actually supported. What is the point of RCS though? It seems to be strictly inferior to Signal. It seems a Google product meant to serve Goo…
> In cases where RCS is able to operate over cellular networks without data, it supports messaging as well as file transfer, enriched calling, and more.
[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rich_Communication_Services