Gun Deaths vs. Gun Ownership
mark.reid.name
Gun Deaths vs. Gun Ownership
1–10 of 10 posts
Re: Gun Deaths vs. Gun Ownership
#2Re: Gun Deaths vs. Gun Ownership
#3Re: Gun Deaths vs. Gun Ownership
#4It's worth noting that _both_ of the outliers on this chart are the direct responsibility of the US population.
Re: Gun Deaths vs. Gun Ownership
#5Re: Gun Deaths vs. Gun Ownership
#6This is like the very definition of 'bad topic' for this site. Guaranteed to get people riled up, not germane to startups or hacking, very political in nature, and something where no one ever convinces anyone else anyway.
Re: Gun Deaths vs. Gun Ownership
#7This is like the very definition of 'bad topic' for this site. Guaranteed to get people riled up, not germane to startups or hacking, very political in nature, and something where no one ever convinces anyone else anyway.
The author demonstrates how to use R to analyze the data, and he illustrates a "deeply interesting" correlation. (Causation is another question.)
Just because the topic is controversial does not mean that it is not "deeply interesting". From the HN welcome page:
What does "deeply interesting" mean? It means stuff that teaches
you about the world. A story about a robbery, for example,
would probably not be deeply interesting. But if this robbery
was a sign of some bigger, underlying trend, then perhaps
it could be.
Source: http://ycombinator.com/newswelcome.htmlRe: Gun Deaths vs. Gun Ownership
#8Re: Gun Deaths vs. Gun Ownership
#9This is like the very definition of 'bad topic' for this site. Guaranteed to get people riled up, not germane to startups or hacking, very political in nature, and something where no one ever convinces anyone else anyway.
Yup, flagged it as well. Sure, it has a few lines of code and some nice looking graph, but the subject is just creating controversy.
Don't kill a technical article just because the sample data used might whip up feelings in countries where it's a political issue. Science shouldn't back up from things like that.