OpenAI’s head of ethics leaves less than a year after joining
1–10 of 279 posts
Re: OpenAI’s head of ethics leaves less than a year after joining
#2[flagged]
Re: OpenAI’s head of ethics leaves less than a year after joining
#3> ethical approaches to model development, how humans interact with AI and debate over machine consciousness
So, pseudo-philosophical mumbo jumbo. There is of course no-one responsible for the ethical framework of the company's actions, because it is a company, and therefore amoral at best and immoral at worst.
Re: OpenAI’s head of ethics leaves less than a year after joining
#4[flagged]
Re: OpenAI’s head of ethics leaves less than a year after joining
#5> ethical approaches to model development, how humans interact with AI and debate over machine consciousness So, pseudo-philosophical mumbo jumbo. There is of course no-one responsible for the ethical framework of the company's actions, because it is a company, and therefore amoral at best and immoral at worst.
I hate these companies as much as the next guy but this perspective is childish at best, and ignorant at worst.
Re: OpenAI’s head of ethics leaves less than a year after joining
#6> Before working at OpenAI, she was Meta’s chief ethicist
Re: OpenAI’s head of ethics leaves less than a year after joining
#7> Before working at OpenAI, she was Meta’s chief ethicist
So more of an ethicist-for-pay than for the challenge of it.
Re: OpenAI’s head of ethics leaves less than a year after joining
#8> ethical approaches to model development, how humans interact with AI and debate over machine consciousness So, pseudo-philosophical mumbo jumbo. There is of course no-one responsible for the ethical framework of the company's actions, because it is a company, and therefore amoral at best and immoral at worst.
I hate these companies as much as the next guy but this perspective is childish at best, and ignorant at worst.
Which perspective? I said two things.
Re: OpenAI’s head of ethics leaves less than a year after joining
#9> ethical approaches to model development, how humans interact with AI and debate over machine consciousness So, pseudo-philosophical mumbo jumbo. There is of course no-one responsible for the ethical framework of the company's actions, because it is a company, and therefore amoral at best and immoral at worst.
I am not sure in what neighbourhood you live, but in my village there are hundreds of businesses with strong morals. From the local baker, to the electrician and the construction company. Many keep employees past their prime, they all invest heavily in local community events and sports. The owners don't do this because of money, but because in their view a fulfilled life is one where you serve your community. And yes they want to become rich and make money, but that is not all.
But it appears that is not how your world works. By default any company owner is a homo-sapiens, but a machine that only wants money. Tragically, your cynicism is creating the very world you hate.
Re: OpenAI’s head of ethics leaves less than a year after joining
#10[flagged]
Well, economics in general doesn't, but yes.
There isn't much ethical merit in building a wall around a city with guard towers, attack dogs, and anti-personnel mines to keep the citizens in so that they can contribute to your economic vision, for example.