Show HN: Basht – A bash shell that handles multitasking better
1–6 of 6 posts
Re: Show HN: Basht – A bash shell that handles multitasking better
#2Re: Show HN: Basht – A bash shell that handles multitasking better
#3 [ping:1:2814536:59] 64 bytes from ...: icmp_seq=58 ttl=113 time=28.7 ms
[bash:0:2814530:9] samiam@samiam-h-pc-2:~/projects/basht$ ll *.md
[ls:7:2814564:1] -rw-rw-r-- 1 samiam samiam 9790 Aug 10 15:01 basht_plan.md
[ls:7:2814564:2] -rw-rw-r-- 1 samiam samiam 3921 Aug 10 15:43 README.md
[ping:1:2814536:62] 64 bytes from ...: icmp_seq=61 ttl=113 time=26.8 ms
[bash:0:2814530:10] samiam@samiam-h-pc-2:~/projects/basht$
Other that the task adaption, it is stock bash and can be substituted for regular bash.Re: Show HN: Basht – A bash shell that handles multitasking better
#4I adapted the bash shell 5.3 to more easily handle tasking. Each command & has its output gathered into lines and each line is tagged and send to the output with a preamble. The bash input stays on the command line and you can type command lines, select history, anything, even while the background tasks output appears above that: [ping:1:2814536:59] 64 bytes from ...: icmp_seq=58 ttl=113 time=28.7 ms [bash:0:2814530:…
Re: Show HN: Basht – A bash shell that handles multitasking better
#5I adapted the bash shell 5.3 to more easily handle tasking. Each command & has its output gathered into lines and each line is tagged and send to the output with a preamble. The bash input stays on the command line and you can type command lines, select history, anything, even while the background tasks output appears above that: [ping:1:2814536:59] 64 bytes from ...: icmp_seq=58 ttl=113 time=28.7 ms [bash:0:2814530:…
Did you propose adding this capability to bash with the project maintainer(s)? If so, what was their response? If not, why not?
Thanks for the question.
Re: Show HN: Basht – A bash shell that handles multitasking better
#6I adapted the bash shell 5.3 to more easily handle tasking. Each command & has its output gathered into lines and each line is tagged and send to the output with a preamble. The bash input stays on the command line and you can type command lines, select history, anything, even while the background tasks output appears above that: [ping:1:2814536:59] 64 bytes from ...: icmp_seq=58 ttl=113 time=28.7 ms [bash:0:2814530:…
Did you propose adding this capability to bash with the project maintainer(s)? If so, what was their response? If not, why not?