An SLM trained on $8 ESP32-S3
github.com
An SLM trained on $8 ESP32-S3
1–10 of 23 posts
Re: An SLM trained on $8 ESP32-S3
#2Number of parameters: 319K
(Disclaimer) The models is tiny and is not a pocket chatbot. It mistakes and is not capable to support conversation, but that's not the goal of the project
The goals of the project is to bring training to edge devices and it worked out
How can one use it? By using solar panels such device could be turned into autonomous meteorological station
Re: An SLM trained on $8 ESP32-S3
#3I wonder when we'll start seeing clusters of ESP32-S3s... not sure how interconnects would go though, but I guess the interconnect wouldn't be the bottleneck anyway.
Re: An SLM trained on $8 ESP32-S3
#4Re: An SLM trained on $8 ESP32-S3
#5Very cool project! Sounds like it was a fun challenge :) I wonder when we'll start seeing clusters of ESP32-S3s... not sure how interconnects would go though, but I guess the interconnect wouldn't be the bottleneck anyway.
Re: An SLM trained on $8 ESP32-S3
#6Re: An SLM trained on $8 ESP32-S3
#7> Backpropagation (gradients derived by hand)
What does by hand mean in this context?
Also how did you write the readme? It's a curious blend of human and AI writing.
Re: An SLM trained on $8 ESP32-S3
#8Very cool project. > Backpropagation (gradients derived by hand) What does by hand mean in this context? Also how did you write the readme? It's a curious blend of human and AI writing.
Anyways, it looks like gradients derived by hand means they didn't use autograd. They have written out the expression for dL/dW themselves.
Re: An SLM trained on $8 ESP32-S3
#9Very cool project! Sounds like it was a fun challenge :) I wonder when we'll start seeing clusters of ESP32-S3s... not sure how interconnects would go though, but I guess the interconnect wouldn't be the bottleneck anyway.
Re: An SLM trained on $8 ESP32-S3
#10Very cool project. > Backpropagation (gradients derived by hand) What does by hand mean in this context? Also how did you write the readme? It's a curious blend of human and AI writing.
The fact that by hand is emphasized so often and so often (see src/handgpt.h comments as well above backward()) makes me think it's AI. Anyways, it looks like gradients derived by hand means they didn't use autograd. They have written out the expression for dL/dW themselves.