Webb telescope finds signs of ancient disaster for Neptune's moons
1–7 of 7 posts
Re: Webb telescope finds signs of ancient disaster for Neptune's moons
#2Original paper if you want to skip the news sumamry: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.aeb1437
Re: Webb telescope finds signs of ancient disaster for Neptune's moons
#3I am so stupid-excited for Nancy Grace Roman launch just a few weeks, surprised no posts yet
it's not a competition but JWST almost pales to the state-of-the-art tech (because JWST was held up for so many years budget-wise)
28mbps downlink vs 500mbps from a MILLION MILES AWAY, 1.5TB per day download
imagine what new they will discover with it
Re: Webb telescope finds signs of ancient disaster for Neptune's moons
#4I am so stupid-excited for Nancy Grace Roman launch just a few weeks, surprised no posts yet it's not a competition but JWST almost pales to the state-of-the-art tech (because JWST was held up for so many years budget-wise) 28mbps downlink vs 500mbps from a MILLION MILES AWAY, 1.5TB per day download imagine what new they will discover with it * https://nextspaceflight.com/launches/details/6983/ * https://svs.gsfc.nas…
Yes, but remember they are very different telescopes for different types of astronomy. Roman is a survey telescope with a wide field of view, designed to discover new objects, etc. JWST has a large aperture and narrow FOV to get the closest look possible at specific targets identified in advance. They will compliment each other well.
Re: Webb telescope finds signs of ancient disaster for Neptune's moons
#5I am so stupid-excited for Nancy Grace Roman launch just a few weeks, surprised no posts yet it's not a competition but JWST almost pales to the state-of-the-art tech (because JWST was held up for so many years budget-wise) 28mbps downlink vs 500mbps from a MILLION MILES AWAY, 1.5TB per day download imagine what new they will discover with it * https://nextspaceflight.com/launches/details/6983/ * https://svs.gsfc.nas…
Yes, but remember they are very different telescopes for different types of astronomy. Roman is a survey telescope with a wide field of view, designed to discover new objects, etc. JWST has a large aperture and narrow FOV to get the closest look possible at specific targets identified in advance. They will compliment each other well.
Regrettable English nit: "complement", not "compliment".
Re: Webb telescope finds signs of ancient disaster for Neptune's moons
#6Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, but remember they are very different telescopes for different types of astronomy. Roman is a survey telescope with a wide field of view, designed to discover new objects, etc. JWST has a large aperture and narrow FOV to get the closest look possible at specific targets identified in advance. They will compliment each other well.
Regrettable English nit: "complement", not "compliment".
They are also programmed to send sweet nothings to each other at consistent intervals.
Re: Webb telescope finds signs of ancient disaster for Neptune's moons
#7> Neptune's inner moons may be the only place in the solar system where we can directly observe that material [from the insides of a past moon]
Clearly this means that we need a Neptune orbiter mission! And soon, I'm not getting any younger and I want to see it.