Cooking for Engineers

#1

Post by simonpure » Wed, Jul 29, 2026, 1:31 PM UTC

Cooking for Engineers
cookingforengineers.com

Re: Cooking for Engineers

#2

Post by pastemato » Wed, Jul 29, 2026, 5:13 PM UTC

A lot the recipes themselves are not really dishes I'm interested in cooking, but I adore the recipe ingredient and process summary tables, very intuitive way to communicate the full process of preparing a dish with parallel and converging steps.

Re: Cooking for Engineers

#3

Post by quentindanjou » Wed, Jul 29, 2026, 6:25 PM UTC

I would rather see grams than tablespoons as a metric, I think it is much easier to cook with everything under one unit.

Re: Cooking for Engineers

#4

Post by effnorwood » Wed, Jul 29, 2026, 7:23 PM UTC

Don't and thermoworks for the win.

Re: Cooking for Engineers

#5

Post by voicedYoda » Wed, Jul 29, 2026, 8:14 PM UTC

Getting a 500

Re: Cooking for Engineers

#6

Post by gabrielsroka » Wed, Jul 29, 2026, 9:28 PM UTC

2004? 2007?

https://news.ycombinator.com/from?site=cookingforengineers.c...

Re: Cooking for Engineers

#7

Post by Graziano_M » Thu, Jul 30, 2026, 2:43 AM UTC

The site is down, but I remember saving this site on del.icio.us way back in the day.

Re: Cooking for Engineers

#8

Post by abbie3050 » Sat, Aug 01, 2026, 5:45 PM UTC

[flagged]

Re: Cooking for Engineers

#9

Post by abbie3050 » Sat, Aug 01, 2026, 5:48 PM UTC

pastemato wrote: post #2

A lot the recipes themselves are not really dishes I'm interested in cooking, but I adore the recipe ingredient and process summary tables, very intuitive way to communicate the full process of preparing a dish with parallel and converging steps.

[dead]