EPA says [dedicated] power for data centers can sidestep pollution laws
1–10 of 10 posts
Re: EPA says [dedicated] power for data centers can sidestep pollution laws
#2Re: EPA says [dedicated] power for data centers can sidestep pollution laws
#3Re: EPA says [dedicated] power for data centers can sidestep pollution laws
#4Sounds like rural America is continuing to get exactly what they voted for - regulatory capture and business growth.
Re: EPA says [dedicated] power for data centers can sidestep pollution laws
#5We are making a choice, it is more important to the nation to acceleate power consumption support over health concerns and climate change.
Even if allowing this exception, how much head room does that even buy us? 10 years, 1 year, 6 months worth of growth? How does that measure against bringing new cleaner energy production online?
Either the bubble will pop, efficiency gains in models/tech/hardware reduce demand, or we hit the ceiling anyways. So is it worth paying this cost in the mid-term?
Re: EPA says [dedicated] power for data centers can sidestep pollution laws
#6Sounds like rural America is continuing to get exactly what they voted for - regulatory capture and business growth.
I find this rhetoric repulsive and only serves to harm the many in favor of the few who manipulate party politics and spread broad blind hate.
Re: EPA says [dedicated] power for data centers can sidestep pollution laws
#7Re: EPA says [dedicated] power for data centers can sidestep pollution laws
#8Sounds like rural America is continuing to get exactly what they voted for - regulatory capture and business growth.
Yeah screw those areas that voted 49% against Trump, unlike those other areas that only voted 49% of Trump. Obviously having a tiny difference in voter preference means everyone in the area is trash and deserves to suffer. /s I find this rhetoric repulsive and only serves to harm the many in favor of the few who manipulate party politics and spread broad blind hate.
Re: EPA says [dedicated] power for data centers can sidestep pollution laws
#9Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah screw those areas that voted 49% against Trump, unlike those other areas that only voted 49% of Trump. Obviously having a tiny difference in voter preference means everyone in the area is trash and deserves to suffer. /s I find this rhetoric repulsive and only serves to harm the many in favor of the few who manipulate party politics and spread broad blind hate.
What a faithful representation of my statment.