Many "serious" mathematicians are aghast
twitter.com
Many "serious" mathematicians are aghast
1–10 of 32 posts
Re: Many "serious" mathematicians are aghast
#2*unspoken or unintended consequence being so that the oligarchy can seize the authority of intellectual credibility
Re: Many "serious" mathematicians are aghast
#3Re: Many "serious" mathematicians are aghast
#4There is a quotation about peer review. I'm assuming that's also made up.
Re: Many "serious" mathematicians are aghast
#5Re: Many "serious" mathematicians are aghast
#6Many "serious" performance engineers are aghast
"Nooo the r00b0t can't make llvm faster and not tell us how!!! it has to make a commit to the open source!!!"
"Ha, that's peer review and politics"
Re: Many "serious" mathematicians are aghast
#7Which serious mathematicians? There is a quotation about peer review. I'm assuming that's also made up.
Re: Many "serious" mathematicians are aghast
#8Re: Many "serious" mathematicians are aghast
#9I do think that there are two things going on that explains the past couple weeks' breakthroughs:
1) A lot of conjectures are weakly grounded.
2) Maybe humans are biased towards proving conjectures rather than finding counter-examples (prestige in finding proofs, tedium in searching for contradictions, etc.)
3) Math is one of the rare fields that can be 'solved' in pure token space without needing empirical or subjective-opinion support
Re: Many "serious" mathematicians are aghast
#10LLMs are bad at math of course. You can't calculate non-deterministically and expect accuracy. https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2025/07/ai-leaps-from...