Show HN: Intersections – A Daily Word Game
playintersections.com
Show HN: Intersections – A Daily Word Game
1–6 of 6 posts
Re: Show HN: Intersections – A Daily Word Game
#2Meanwhile, and I say this as someone who plays a lot of puzzles, this feels distinctly unfair? Too many valid positions for each answer, which makes it more sodoku like but without the ability to validate against concrete rules. Forces a full mental layout of every possible position to find the one(?) Valid layout.
Re: Show HN: Intersections – A Daily Word Game
#3Not a bad concept, but there's an unwritten rule in most puzzles that the clue and answer can't overlap. Really messed with me for shark tank. Meanwhile, and I say this as someone who plays a lot of puzzles, this feels distinctly unfair? Too many valid positions for each answer, which makes it more sodoku like but without the ability to validate against concrete rules. Forces a full mental layout of every possible po…
Re: Show HN: Intersections – A Daily Word Game
#4 — Jul 21
My score: 1000
16/16 correct in 3:44
0 mistakesRe: Show HN: Intersections – A Daily Word Game
#5Not a bad concept, but there's an unwritten rule in most puzzles that the clue and answer can't overlap. Really messed with me for shark tank. Meanwhile, and I say this as someone who plays a lot of puzzles, this feels distinctly unfair? Too many valid positions for each answer, which makes it more sodoku like but without the ability to validate against concrete rules. Forces a full mental layout of every possible po…
Thank you for the feedback. I’m no puzzle making pro, but yes the decoy clues were my idea. Scores are based on time and number of errors, with preference given to fewer errors. So I liked that it adds a layer of strategy as to going fast vs. checking possibilities.
Re: Show HN: Intersections – A Daily Word Game
#6I enjoyed it. Not sure what happens if you put an answer in wrong, does it validate as you go? The dynamic was satisfying in that it gets easier as you go. — Jul 21 My score: 1000 16/16 correct in 3:44 0 mistakes