M-Chips: M7 with up to 1.5 TB – and why Apple is skipping the M6
1–7 of 7 posts
Re: M-Chips: M7 with up to 1.5 TB – and why Apple is skipping the M6
#2Related: Apple to skip high-end M6 Mac chips in favor of AI-focused M7 line (318 points, 380 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48676795
Discussion last week (26 points, 31 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48894277
Re: M-Chips: M7 with up to 1.5 TB – and why Apple is skipping the M6
#3Re: M-Chips: M7 with up to 1.5 TB – and why Apple is skipping the M6
#4I hope they put a better connector than TB5 so we can cluster them properly at 1TB/S
So I guess someone wanting that would be prepared for it.
Re: M-Chips: M7 with up to 1.5 TB – and why Apple is skipping the M6
#5This is a marketing cost play, nothing else. They're happy to raise their prices on their existing plays and wait out the ram cartel.
It might work, depending on the regulators appetite for breaking the monopolies and the AI circular fraud.
Re: M-Chips: M7 with up to 1.5 TB – and why Apple is skipping the M6
#6I hope they put a better connector than TB5 so we can cluster them properly at 1TB/S
I started writing a sarcastic comment to "prepare for $500 Apple-branded QSFP112 DAC cables", but realized (a) that's not too much higher than some already sell for, and (b) it's close to a linear scaling from TB5 price-per-bandwidth (not exactly, but close). So I guess someone wanting that would be prepared for it.
Re: M-Chips: M7 with up to 1.5 TB – and why Apple is skipping the M6
#7I hope they put a better connector than TB5 so we can cluster them properly at 1TB/S