Trump, not Iran, is the greatest danger
theguardian.com
Trump, not Iran, is the greatest danger
1–7 of 7 posts
Re: Trump, not Iran, is the greatest danger
#2Funny how newspapers so blatantly defend terrorism just to attack the other side they don't like. It's as stupid as it gets.
Re: Trump, not Iran, is the greatest danger
#3Funny how newspapers so blatantly defend terrorism just to attack the other side they don't like. It's as stupid as it gets.
Tearing up working agreements for petty reasons and later attacking during negotiations for a replacement agreement is certainly stupid but hardly terrorism.
Re: Trump, not Iran, is the greatest danger
#4Funny how newspapers so blatantly defend terrorism just to attack the other side they don't like. It's as stupid as it gets.
Tearing up working agreements for petty reasons and later attacking during negotiations for a replacement agreement is certainly stupid but hardly terrorism.
I think the op implied that Trump is fighting terrorism :) Which he is obviously not. He is lining his pockets.
Re: Trump, not Iran, is the greatest danger
#5Funny how newspapers so blatantly defend terrorism just to attack the other side they don't like. It's as stupid as it gets.
Tearing up working agreements for petty reasons and later attacking during negotiations for a replacement agreement is certainly stupid but hardly terrorism.
They were known as such way before any of this happening, it's only getting more obvious now. They have quite a track record you need to dig up if you want to make sense of this, not the news for the last three months.
Re: Trump, not Iran, is the greatest danger
#6Earlier quoted context omitted.
Tearing up working agreements for petty reasons and later attacking during negotiations for a replacement agreement is certainly stupid but hardly terrorism.
They were known as such way before any of this happening, it's only getting more obvious now. They have quite a track record you need to dig up if you want to make sense of this, not the news for the last three months.
> not the news for the last three months.
I've already alluded to the US withdrawal from the Iran / P5+1 JCPOA in 2018.
Should I go back as far as the Anglo-Persian Oil Company in 1909, or further back to the 5th millennium BC ?
Re: Trump, not Iran, is the greatest danger
#7Earlier quoted context omitted.
They were known as such way before any of this happening, it's only getting more obvious now. They have quite a track record you need to dig up if you want to make sense of this, not the news for the last three months.
> not the news for the last three months. I've already alluded to the US withdrawal from the Iran / P5+1 JCPOA in 2018. Should I go back as far as the Anglo-Persian Oil Company in 1909, or further back to the 5th millennium BC ?
[dead]