Digg Finally Admits the Auto-Bury Exists
brentcsutoras.com
Digg Finally Admits the Auto-Bury Exists
1–10 of 39 posts
Re: Digg Finally Admits the Auto-Bury Exists
#2Re: Digg Finally Admits the Auto-Bury Exists
#3Why is there drama about this? If pg had an auto-kill script for stories posted by me, would you care?
Re: Digg Finally Admits the Auto-Bury Exists
#4Re: Digg Finally Admits the Auto-Bury Exists
#5Re: Digg Finally Admits the Auto-Bury Exists
#6Why is there drama about this? If pg had an auto-kill script for stories posted by me, would you care?
Re: Digg Finally Admits the Auto-Bury Exists
#7Re: Digg Finally Admits the Auto-Bury Exists
#8Unmoderated forums quickly become dictatorships by the most insane. The fact that the links that float to the top on Digg are consistently bland, general-appeal, and uncontroversial despite the YouTube-like sophistication of its users suggests that the ranking algorithm is pretty far from democratic.
That is a pretty accurate description of reddit...I'm glad that HN has active moderation, even though it's rarely needed.
Re: Digg Finally Admits the Auto-Bury Exists
#9(The game is still "admitting painfully obvious stuff that everyone already knows" right?)
Re: Digg Finally Admits the Auto-Bury Exists
#10Unmoderated forums quickly become dictatorships by the most insane. The fact that the links that float to the top on Digg are consistently bland, general-appeal, and uncontroversial despite the YouTube-like sophistication of its users suggests that the ranking algorithm is pretty far from democratic.
Unmoderated forums quickly become dictatorships by the most insane. That is a pretty accurate description of reddit...I'm glad that HN has active moderation, even though it's rarely needed.
Seriously, go try to edit one the few somewhat-prominent WP articles that aren't locked and see how quickly someone comes up with a BS reason to revert your perfectly good edits. This happens especially often if you edit something political or religious in nature. It's a mess.