MicroVM sandbox on Win, Mac, Linux, with policy engine
docs.docker.com
MicroVM sandbox on Win, Mac, Linux, with policy engine
1–8 of 8 posts
Re: MicroVM sandbox on Win, Mac, Linux, with policy engine
#2I don't really understand why anyone needs a bunch of new ways to say "run this without giving access to anything on my system", because I feel like we already have a ton of solutions for that. The hard problem is figuring out how to say "run this with access to some things on my system without making it incredibly tedious to specify those things", and from what I can tell, tools like this mostly punt on the "don't make it incredibly tedious" part by just letting you dump a bunch of manual settings in a config file and then assuming that people will share them after. That's a reasonable place to draw the line if you're an individual developer writing your own bespoke tool for how you want to sandbox things, but coming from maybe the most widely used container system in existence, shouldn't the bar be a bit higher?
Re: MicroVM sandbox on Win, Mac, Linux, with policy engine
#3Re: MicroVM sandbox on Win, Mac, Linux, with policy engine
#4It comes too late to the game, as Apple and Microsoft already have their own solutions in flight, which were demoed at the respective developer conferences.
Re: MicroVM sandbox on Win, Mac, Linux, with policy engine
#5It comes too late to the game, as Apple and Microsoft already have their own solutions in flight, which were demoed at the respective developer conferences.
2 different platforms, 2 separate sources of truths for policies, 2 different level of compatibility (apple containers don't support compose, MS uses a custom moby implementation, neither are particular mature), none has linux compatibilty?
So how does Docker capitalise on this new tool?
They keep trying to stay relevant in a world where containers have become commodity.
Re: MicroVM sandbox on Win, Mac, Linux, with policy engine
#6Earlier quoted context omitted.
2 different platforms, 2 separate sources of truths for policies, 2 different level of compatibility (apple containers don't support compose, MS uses a custom moby implementation, neither are particular mature), none has linux compatibilty?
Yes, but both would save on Docker licenses and it isn't as if anyone would pay for Docker tooling on Linux anyway. So how does Docker capitalise on this new tool? They keep trying to stay relevant in a world where containers have become commodity.
Re: MicroVM sandbox on Win, Mac, Linux, with policy engine
#7Earlier quoted context omitted.
2 different platforms, 2 separate sources of truths for policies, 2 different level of compatibility (apple containers don't support compose, MS uses a custom moby implementation, neither are particular mature), none has linux compatibilty?
Yes, but both would save on Docker licenses and it isn't as if anyone would pay for Docker tooling on Linux anyway. So how does Docker capitalise on this new tool? They keep trying to stay relevant in a world where containers have become commodity.
You can call containers a commodity, or an industry standard? Feels like that is more an emotional argument than anything else.
Re: MicroVM sandbox on Win, Mac, Linux, with policy engine
#8I'd also really like an easy way to acquire the appropriate kernel(s), initrd and rootfs needed to bootstrap a microvm of whatever distro I'd like to try at the moment.