Live data from Hacker News

Snails' teeth beats spider silk as nature's strongest material (2015)

smithsonianmag.com

1–10 of 179 posts

Re: Snails' teeth beats spider silk as nature's strongest material (2015)

#5
post #3

> 3,300 one-pound bags of sugar Ah, but how many one pound bags of concrete could it hold?? Why bags of anything? This is a poor way of communicating weight. Just say "a modern passenger car".

Sorry I only understand football field based units of measurement

Re: Snails' teeth beats spider silk as nature's strongest material (2015)

#6
post #4
post #2

[2015], with a nice correction from 2017 about the differences between compressive and tensile strength.

now, let's combine both.

Do you prefer a web-weaving snail or an extra-bitey spider? I'm leaning spider.

Re: Snails' teeth beats spider silk as nature's strongest material (2015)

#7
post #3

> 3,300 one-pound bags of sugar Ah, but how many one pound bags of concrete could it hold?? Why bags of anything? This is a poor way of communicating weight. Just say "a modern passenger car".

I noticed that too. I feel like this might be a new way of laundering AI written text, just provide the quote verbatim as if the they believe it was actually written by the author.

Re: Snails' teeth beats spider silk as nature's strongest material (2015)

#9
post #3

> 3,300 one-pound bags of sugar Ah, but how many one pound bags of concrete could it hold?? Why bags of anything? This is a poor way of communicating weight. Just say "a modern passenger car".

Sorry I only understand football field based units of measurement

It’s a real condition. For me it’s jet liners of various makes. I had to rewrite the quote as “0.005 Boeing 777’s” to be able to comprehend just how strong those snails teeth are.
Post reply on HN