Abject Praise
infrequently.org
Abject Praise
1–10 of 26 posts
Re: Abject Praise
#2Re: Abject Praise
#3If not all browsers support a feature, don't use it, or make it optional. It's not that hard. If you can't figure it out, ask your LLM.
Re: Abject Praise
#4If not all browsers support a feature, don't use it, or make it optional. It's not that hard. If you can't figure it out, ask your LLM.
What does a web dev have to do with Apple's choice? How do you improve Safari by not using features it doesn't support? What does your comment have to do with the argument the article is making?
Re: Abject Praise
#5If not all browsers support a feature, don't use it, or make it optional. It's not that hard. If you can't figure it out, ask your LLM.
Re: Abject Praise
#6If not all browsers support a feature, don't use it, or make it optional. It's not that hard. If you can't figure it out, ask your LLM.
These large, persistent gaps matter to the mobile and web ecosystems because Apple is unique in denying access to more capable, less-buggy engines and actively erecting unlawful barriers to choice when forced by legislation to enable it. This is accomplished through eye-watering budgets for legal shenanigans, direct lobbying, and well-heeled astroturf front groups to maintain a capability gap between web and native.4
That chasm is instrumental in trapping users and developers in the extractive vice of Cupertino's App Store. A persistent, material gap in capabilities creates a perception of the web being less-than; a budget option for the unserious. Should users choose more capable, more private, less buggy browsers for a larger share of their computing needs, Apple might lose the leverage that enables it to extract rents.
Re: Abject Praise
#7Re: Abject Praise
#8Re: Abject Praise
#9"Rubbishing" is a worthless gerund. Is rubbish even a verb anywhere?
Re: Abject Praise
#10The author may get further if they put love of communication over love of language. "Rubbishing" is a worthless gerund. Is rubbish even a verb anywhere?