Live data from Hacker News

Workers Cache

blog.cloudflare.com

1–10 of 87 posts

Re: Workers Cache

#6
post #5

The feature is great. The post itself is a slop grenade.

Billion dollar company can't afford one human copywriter. The future is great! (edit: copyrighter -> copywriter)

They could just feed an llm a small corpus of past human authored posts from their site, and have the LLM rewrite it in a style matching style, and it would likely turn out pretty great.

Re: Workers Cache

#7

The feature is great. The post itself is a slop grenade.

Can you elaborate? I read it, found the concepts well explained, walked away better informed.

Responding to alleged slop with more slop doesn’t decrease the total amount of slop on the internet.

Re: Workers Cache

#8
post #7

The feature is great. The post itself is a slop grenade.

Can you elaborate? I read it, found the concepts well explained, walked away better informed. Responding to alleged slop with more slop doesn’t decrease the total amount of slop on the internet.

You think I'm using AI to leave comments like this on HN?

Re: Workers Cache

#10
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can you elaborate? I read it, found the concepts well explained, walked away better informed. Responding to alleged slop with more slop doesn’t decrease the total amount of slop on the internet.

You think I'm using AI to leave comments like this on HN?

"slop" doesn't mean "AI generated content", it means bad content, a waste of the reader's time. Grantparent's implication is that your comment was bad content, not that it was AI generated bad content.
Post reply on HN