WSJ Article Claiming China Has Matched Anthropic Is Obvious Nonsense
thezvi.substack.com
WSJ Article Claiming China Has Matched Anthropic Is Obvious Nonsense
1–3 of 3 posts
Re: WSJ Article Claiming China Has Matched Anthropic Is Obvious Nonsense
#2WSJ is rampant sensationalism and FAKE news, along with nag screens, why bother ?
Re: WSJ Article Claiming China Has Matched Anthropic Is Obvious Nonsense
#3Just fighting nonsense with nonsense.
Is Mythos / Fable good: yes Is it 10x better: no
So this special "Mythos" class especially in security -- what does it even mean? Is it ChatGPT 10 class?
i.e. it is just marketing.
What does banning a model if it is Mythos class mean? Where's the guideline? Security benchmark XYZ reaching 99/100? No.
So China has matched hype with hype. What's wrong with that? You get what you deserve. People are all playing by those same rules this whole hype started with.