Incident CVE-2026-LGTM
nesbitt.io
Incident CVE-2026-LGTM
1–10 of 108 posts
Re: Incident CVE-2026-LGTM
#2[flagged]
Re: Incident CVE-2026-LGTM
#3This incident report is WILD
The incident was resolved when the attacker’s autonomous agent read a file it shouldn’t have, which is also how the incident started.Re: Incident CVE-2026-LGTM
#4> Duration: 96 hours (billable: 2.1 trillion tokens)
Now there's a metric that would make my boss nervous.
> Total inference spend across all parties during the incident window was $1.7M, which Marketing has asked us to start describing as “a record investment in autonomous customer assurance.”
This is too funny.
Re: Incident CVE-2026-LGTM
#5This incident report is WILD The incident was resolved when the attacker’s autonomous agent read a file it shouldn’t have, which is also how the incident started.
Seems perfectly cromulent to me. And thanks to Karen Oyelaran for her work.
Re: Incident CVE-2026-LGTM
#6This incident report is WILD The incident was resolved when the attacker’s autonomous agent read a file it shouldn’t have, which is also how the incident started.
It’s satire.
Re: Incident CVE-2026-LGTM
#7This incident report is WILD The incident was resolved when the attacker’s autonomous agent read a file it shouldn’t have, which is also how the incident started.
PSA this is satire ;)
(if you have to say it, that’s how you know it’s good)
Re: Incident CVE-2026-LGTM
#8[deleted]
Re: Incident CVE-2026-LGTM
#9I actually know a goat rancher who is working to require ag impact studies for data centers in Texas. Sounds like I should give him a call while I can.
(Also CVE-2026-LGTM would be an awesome name for a Culture ship)
Re: Incident CVE-2026-LGTM
#10Perhaps a [Satire] note should be added to the headline.