Live data from Hacker News

The frontier is open-source today

southbridge.ai

1–10 of 18 posts

Re: The frontier is open-source today

#2
Anthropic and OpenAI window for a successful IPO is reducing day by day. All that pressure from their debts, compute costs, infrastructure investments, training costs, and open weight models continuing to improve. I know the stock market is all about hype and isn’t rational, but there will be a point where the hype will fade away, and they have no moat that will differentiate them from the rest.

Good for consumers, it’s competition at its best, we get cheaper, better services. But I would be pretty concerned integrating an AI lab products into my business without having a good abstraction that makes it easy to swap between vendor.

Re: The frontier is open-source today

#5
I've been driving glm-5.2 for a day or two now. It feels like a mature, seasoned colleague.

It could be luck, but I don't know -- it keeps one-shotting relatively hard stuff. And taking initiative to think about what potential regressions it should look out for, and choosing to do strategic refactoring when it should do. It is not confidently incorrect hardly at all, doesn't tell me that it's fresh risky pile of changes is ready for production without having exercised all the code paths and writing a bunch of tests, etc.

We might be reaching the next level here...

Re: The frontier is open-source today

#6

I've been driving glm-5.2 for a day or two now. It feels like a mature, seasoned colleague. It could be luck, but I don't know -- it keeps one-shotting relatively hard stuff. And taking initiative to think about what potential regressions it should look out for, and choosing to do strategic refactoring when it should do. It is not confidently incorrect hardly at all, doesn't tell me that it's fresh risky pile of chan…

What's your hardware stack?

Re: The frontier is open-source today

#8
post #2

Anthropic and OpenAI window for a successful IPO is reducing day by day. All that pressure from their debts, compute costs, infrastructure investments, training costs, and open weight models continuing to improve. I know the stock market is all about hype and isn’t rational, but there will be a point where the hype will fade away, and they have no moat that will differentiate them from the rest. Good for consumers, i…

> But I would be pretty concerned integrating an AI lab products into my business without having a good abstraction that makes it easy to swap between vendor.

I’d look for OpenResponse-compatible endpoints in your shoes. These are meant to be plug and play.

Re: The frontier is open-source today

#9

I've been driving glm-5.2 for a day or two now. It feels like a mature, seasoned colleague. It could be luck, but I don't know -- it keeps one-shotting relatively hard stuff. And taking initiative to think about what potential regressions it should look out for, and choosing to do strategic refactoring when it should do. It is not confidently incorrect hardly at all, doesn't tell me that it's fresh risky pile of chan…

Which harness are you using?

Re: The frontier is open-source today

#10
Please correct me if I'm wrong, I'm totally out of my field here but what's the point of sota models that can be run only by hyperscalers? I mean, glm-5.2 is open source but with 1.5TB in weights who can run it really? It still needs dozens of H100s. Those 753B quantized down to Q4 (~400Gb) would require datacenter levels of hardware. Down to Q2 still would require serious hardware, way out of reach for most users, and you'll be far from the sota benchmark of the full precision model. I get it, it's open source but not quite democratizing LLM for everyone except compute providers. It's no like, let's say, Kubernetes. I can run k8s fully in my shitty homelab, without "quantization" exactly like Google does in their datacenters.
Post reply on HN