A 10K-star milestone for Diskless Kafka

The main difference is the layer where diskless is introduced. KIP-1150 makes it a diskless topic path with a Batch Coordinator; AutoMQ tries to keep the existing Kafka broker/leader path and swap out the storage underneath.

That makes the designs feel quite different even though both end up using object/shared storage.

Re: A 10K-star milestone for Diskless Kafka

#8

Post by chenyang » Thu, Jun 18, 2026, 6:22 AM UTC

SiliconGuru wrote: post #7

BooleanMaestro wrote: post #4

Nice to see a mature open-source Diskless Kafka impl. How does this compare to KIP-1150?

The main difference is the layer where diskless is introduced. KIP-1150 makes it a diskless topic path with a Batch Coordinator; AutoMQ tries to keep the existing Kafka broker/leader path and swap out the storage underneath. That makes the designs feel quite different even though both end up using object/shared storage.

[dead]