Keep the News in the Wayback Machine
blog.archive.org
Keep the News in the Wayback Machine
1–6 of 6 posts
Re: Keep the News in the Wayback Machine
#2The obvious solution to me is to allow archive.org access on the agreement that they archive it for later access. Give newspapers, like, a month before giving access to everyone to the archived article.
Re: Keep the News in the Wayback Machine
#3Related discussion last month:
Tell NYT, Atlantic, USA Today to keep Wayback Machine
Re: Keep the News in the Wayback Machine
#4The obvious solution to me is to allow archive.org access on the agreement that they archive it for later access. Give newspapers, like, a month before giving access to everyone to the archived article.
Part of the purpose of archives is to hold power and everyone accountable. Webpages can change at will with no history, so if you can't archive at will you're losing out significantly.
Re: Keep the News in the Wayback Machine
#5The obvious solution to me is to allow archive.org access on the agreement that they archive it for later access. Give newspapers, like, a month before giving access to everyone to the archived article.
Part of the purpose of archives is to hold power and everyone accountable. Webpages can change at will with no history, so if you can't archive at will you're losing out significantly.
Archiving at will would be kept, the change would be in archiving the pages internally for some time and making the captured articles public later.
Re: Keep the News in the Wayback Machine
#6Earlier quoted context omitted.
Part of the purpose of archives is to hold power and everyone accountable. Webpages can change at will with no history, so if you can't archive at will you're losing out significantly.
Archiving at will would be kept, the change would be in archiving the pages internally for some time and making the captured articles public later.
Ah, that's cool. I'd love to see some competition to archive.today