Rio de Janeiro's city government model Rio3.5 beats Qwen3.7 in recent benchmarks
1–10 of 51 posts
Re: Rio de Janeiro's city government model Rio3.5 beats Qwen3.7 in recent benchmarks
#2https://xcancel.com/ZenMagnets/status/2065796012820848699
Correct me if I'm wrong but reading through the comments of the thread this seems to be post training/fine tuning.
Re: Rio de Janeiro's city government model Rio3.5 beats Qwen3.7 in recent benchmarks
#3https://xcancel.com/ZenMagnets/status/2065796012820848699 Correct me if I'm wrong but reading through the comments of the thread this seems to be post training/fine tuning.
Thanks, Firefox and uBlock does not let me watch any X content (I guess this is a good thing)
Re: Rio de Janeiro's city government model Rio3.5 beats Qwen3.7 in recent benchmarks
#4[flagged]
Re: Rio de Janeiro's city government model Rio3.5 beats Qwen3.7 in recent benchmarks
#5Re: Rio de Janeiro's city government model Rio3.5 beats Qwen3.7 in recent benchmarks
#6Every day I'm reminded why I don't spend time on twitter. What use does it have to claim "X is better than Y in benchmark Z, disagreeing with that means disagreeing with me"
Information is power, dick measurements are not.
Re: Rio de Janeiro's city government model Rio3.5 beats Qwen3.7 in recent benchmarks
#7> Post-trained from Qwen 3.5 397B
Model Card:
Re: Rio de Janeiro's city government model Rio3.5 beats Qwen3.7 in recent benchmarks
#8https://xcancel.com/ZenMagnets/status/2065796012820848699 Correct me if I'm wrong but reading through the comments of the thread this seems to be post training/fine tuning.
Yes. It's post training in qwen using the novel SwiReasoning framework.
Re: Rio de Janeiro's city government model Rio3.5 beats Qwen3.7 in recent benchmarks
#9[deleted]
Re: Rio de Janeiro's city government model Rio3.5 beats Qwen3.7 in recent benchmarks
#10[flagged]
A government ideally is a representation of the democratically chosen will of the people. If it is not, work towards making it so. IMO wherever someone says "the government" we should mentally substitute "we all, collectively".
But a specific type of person appears to labour under the illusion that somehow we can get by without we all collectively steering our direction and choosing people who do what needs to be done without commercial interest. Their idea is that instead of choosing people who do it, we just make them compete for who can squeeze the most profit out of dealing with a problem and "somehow" that leads to a better result. When you press them for the details on that part of the mechanism, you will usually get crickets.