DNI Gabbard Reveals Evidence of U.S. Taxpayer-Funded Global Biolab Program
1–10 of 39 posts
Re: DNI Gabbard Reveals Evidence of U.S. Taxpayer-Funded Global Biolab Program
#2Hmm. Gabbard is on the way out. Something tells me that perhaps her bosses may not be so happy about this disclosure.
Re: DNI Gabbard Reveals Evidence of U.S. Taxpayer-Funded Global Biolab Program
#3Hmm. Gabbard is on the way out. Something tells me that perhaps her bosses may not be so happy about this disclosure.
Her real boss is probably thrilled.
Re: DNI Gabbard Reveals Evidence of U.S. Taxpayer-Funded Global Biolab Program
#4Hmm. Gabbard is on the way out. Something tells me that perhaps her bosses may not be so happy about this disclosure.
Maybe not, but let’s hope this gets the attention it deserves and these black programs get shut down and anyone who lied about them in their testimony to Congress get what they deserve, CEOs or otherwise.
Re: DNI Gabbard Reveals Evidence of U.S. Taxpayer-Funded Global Biolab Program
#5yoink, just adding it to the data hoarding collection
Re: DNI Gabbard Reveals Evidence of U.S. Taxpayer-Funded Global Biolab Program
#6"Gain-of-function research (GoF research or GoFR) is medical research that genetically alters an organism in a way that may enhance the biological functions of gene products. This may include an altered pathogenesis, transmissibility, or host range, i.e., the types of hosts that a microorganism can infect. This research is intended to reveal targets to better predict emerging infectious diseases and to develop vaccines and therapeutics." (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gain-of-function_research)
Well vaccines are all fake, right? And we don't care about making people better, right? So clearly these labs must be terrible. Why would we want to fund more people in doing science? I mean really, what has science ever done for us?
"Despite the obvious potential for catastrophic global impact research on dangerous pathogens in biolabs can have, politicians, so-called health professionals like Dr. Fauci, and entities within the Biden administration's national security team lied to the American people about the existence of U.S.-funded and supported biolabs"
Wait. Wasn't Trump the president right before Biden? So, what was it, they opened 160 labs in 4 years? Or was Trump just clueless when they existed when he was in office?
Also, great dig on Fauci. Working as a physician, scientist, immunologist, and Director for the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases for 38 years, definitely doesn't qualify him as a health professional.
Re: DNI Gabbard Reveals Evidence of U.S. Taxpayer-Funded Global Biolab Program
#7Two things to remember. First Tulsi Gabbard has significant Russia connections. She’s also a member of a prolific cult. She’s been protective of Russia for quite some time.
Second, the USSR had biolabs in Ukraine. Ukraine was a central hub for all their bio R&D. When the USSR collapsed these bio labs lost their funding. These bio labs contained many different pathogens and bio-weapons.
It was in the US and the worlds best interest to fund them and wind them down safely and securely.
Re: DNI Gabbard Reveals Evidence of U.S. Taxpayer-Funded Global Biolab Program
#8Re: DNI Gabbard Reveals Evidence of U.S. Taxpayer-Funded Global Biolab Program
#9It's no huge secret that most large, modern countries are researching vaccines for these dangerous diseases. There are quite a few of these labs on U.S. soil as well last I checked. I don't get what the scandal is supposed to be about, other than ensuring the labs remain safe during the war?
Re: DNI Gabbard Reveals Evidence of U.S. Taxpayer-Funded Global Biolab Program
#10I don't understand what we're supposed to be seeing here. The "new evidence" is four slides, one of which is titled "Ukraine Labs: Web of Connections to U.S. BW Defense Industry" but just has a list of logos that have nothing to do with the defense industry. The rest of the slides are related to the US funding research into dangerous diseases, which is not a secret and seems like a good thing to be doing. It also notes that Ukrainian labs are vulnerable to attacks from Russia, which seems pretty obvious.
The text of the press release also seems to have very little to do with the linked evidence.