MacBook Neo is so popular that Apple doubled production
1–10 of 524 posts
Re: MacBook Neo is so popular that Apple doubled production
#2Re: MacBook Neo is so popular that Apple doubled production
#3It’s many years too late IMO but I suppose the economics only made sense once they controlled their own chipset. I imagine doing this in the intel days would have been a far worse choice
Re: MacBook Neo is so popular that Apple doubled production
#4Re: MacBook Neo is so popular that Apple doubled production
#5Re: MacBook Neo is so popular that Apple doubled production
#6I’m not shocked in the slightest. Great price point for younger folks to buy or be given as a gift, the build quality is good for what it is and it is snappy for most uses. It’s many years too late IMO but I suppose the economics only made sense once they controlled their own chipset. I imagine doing this in the intel days would have been a far worse choice
Re: MacBook Neo is so popular that Apple doubled production
#7I’m not shocked in the slightest. Great price point for younger folks to buy or be given as a gift, the build quality is good for what it is and it is snappy for most uses. It’s many years too late IMO but I suppose the economics only made sense once they controlled their own chipset. I imagine doing this in the intel days would have been a far worse choice
Re: MacBook Neo is so popular that Apple doubled production
#8I have to imagine the Neo is lower margin %, but maybe I'm wrong.
Re: MacBook Neo is so popular that Apple doubled production
#9It was also a very low initial production volume to begin with. So doubling isn't because it is doing above everyone's expectations, it is because Apple underestimated the demand. That is also ignoring the summer back to school season.
Re: MacBook Neo is so popular that Apple doubled production
#10I’m not shocked in the slightest. Great price point for younger folks to buy or be given as a gift, the build quality is good for what it is and it is snappy for most uses. It’s many years too late IMO but I suppose the economics only made sense once they controlled their own chipset. I imagine doing this in the intel days would have been a far worse choice