No post body was provided.
Untitled topic
1–5 of 5 posts
Re: undefined
#2The article itself is completely AI written, and writes so many words for essentially a very simple answer "no".
Re: undefined
#3The article itself is completely AI written, and writes so many words for essentially a very simple answer "no".
It's slop, that links to more slop - https://aiweekly.co/alerts/anthropic-opus-48-may-have-traine... - that links to a now-deleted post on Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/1tqj7f8/anthropic_...
Re: undefined
#4> the public evidence proves one thing: Claude Opus 4.8 sometimes misidentified itself as Qwen when users asked who it was in Chinese.
> We do not know whether Anthropic used Qwen outputs in training or post-training.
I hope I saved some of you a click from this ai slop.
Previous discussions, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48324078
Re: undefined
#5The article itself is completely AI written, and writes so many words for essentially a very simple answer "no".
I’m tired, boss