Amazon Has Axed Its New Stargate Series
gateworld.net
Amazon Has Axed Its New Stargate Series
1–10 of 82 posts
Re: Amazon Has Axed Its New Stargate Series
#2Maybe this is a good thing.
Re: Amazon Has Axed Its New Stargate Series
#3The new Quantum Leap was terrible and most of the new Star Trek shows were equally as bad. Maybe this is a good thing.
Re: Amazon Has Axed Its New Stargate Series
#4The new Quantum Leap was terrible and most of the new Star Trek shows were equally as bad. Maybe this is a good thing.
Re: Amazon Has Axed Its New Stargate Series
#5The new Quantum Leap was terrible and most of the new Star Trek shows were equally as bad. Maybe this is a good thing.
Re: Amazon Has Axed Its New Stargate Series
#6They will likely hire the cheapest script writer, who in turn will likely offload it to the cheapest LLM, resulting in derivative work that is not in any way creative or inspiring.
Re: Amazon Has Axed Its New Stargate Series
#7If you haven't seen Stargate SG-1, it was one of the greatest shows. I would rather rewatch it than watch a bad remake. Stargate Atlantis was not half bad either. They will likely hire the cheapest script writer, who in turn will likely offload it to the cheapest LLM, resulting in derivative work that is not in any way creative or inspiring.
Re: Amazon Has Axed Its New Stargate Series
#8It was popular because of who? The fans! No one needed the Disney-ization of Stargate. This is probably a good thing.
Re: Amazon Has Axed Its New Stargate Series
#9The new Quantum Leap was terrible and most of the new Star Trek shows were equally as bad. Maybe this is a good thing.
I'm going to call this news a win.
Re: Amazon Has Axed Its New Stargate Series
#10If you haven't seen Stargate SG-1, it was one of the greatest shows. I would rather rewatch it than watch a bad remake. Stargate Atlantis was not half bad either. They will likely hire the cheapest script writer, who in turn will likely offload it to the cheapest LLM, resulting in derivative work that is not in any way creative or inspiring.