Why China got rich and India didn't
davidoks.blog
Why China got rich and India didn't
1–10 of 84 posts
Re: Why China got rich and India didn't
#2The article feels all over the place.
What should India do to beat China?
Invest in education?
Exterminate millions of its own (undereducated) population in meaningless wars and poorly–planned public works?
Make their women burn their bras?
Switch Communism in for Hinduism and end Democracy?
Other than the first, I think I'd rather bow down to China.
Re: Why China got rich and India didn't
#3If the author is reading - China is a single party nation state, India is a union of states. Dive into the metrics of states, you will find everything from Sub-sharan Africa levels of HDI to the ones that compete with European countries.
Re: Why China got rich and India didn't
#4If the author is reading - China is a single party nation state, India is a union of states. Dive into the metrics of states, you will find everything from Sub-sharan Africa levels of HDI to the ones that compete with European countries.
China has more political parties in parliament than the USA.
Stop spreading FUD
Re: Why China got rich and India didn't
#5Getting to the bottom of this is one of the most important public policy issues in the world. When my family left Bangladesh in 1989, the country’s GDP per capita was similar to China’s and India’s. Today, India and Bangladesh are still poor countries while China has roared ahead. How can you replicate that?
Re: Why China got rich and India didn't
#6If the author is reading - China is a single party nation state, India is a union of states. Dive into the metrics of states, you will find everything from Sub-sharan Africa levels of HDI to the ones that compete with European countries.
China has more political parties in parliament than the USA. Stop spreading FUD
Lol, how is it FUD?
Re: Why China got rich and India didn't
#7So many responses to answer the title
Re: Why China got rich and India didn't
#8If the author is reading - China is a single party nation state, India is a union of states. Dive into the metrics of states, you will find everything from Sub-sharan Africa levels of HDI to the ones that compete with European countries.
How is China (or any other country) any different except the same thing shifted upward?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_administrative_divisio...
Re: Why China got rich and India didn't
#9If the author is reading - China is a single party nation state, India is a union of states. Dive into the metrics of states, you will find everything from Sub-sharan Africa levels of HDI to the ones that compete with European countries.
China has more political parties in parliament than the USA. Stop spreading FUD
And how often do they vote against each other?
Re: Why China got rich and India didn't
#10If the author is reading - China is a single party nation state, India is a union of states. Dive into the metrics of states, you will find everything from Sub-sharan Africa levels of HDI to the ones that compete with European countries.
China has more political parties in parliament than the USA. Stop spreading FUD
It’s fairer to call them factions. Also a misuse of the term “FUD”. They also don’t have a parliament, they have the “National People’s Congress” which doesn’t function as a parliamentary body.