Sites and role specific plugins in Codex
openai.com
Sites and role specific plugins in Codex
1–8 of 8 posts
Re: Sites and role specific plugins in Codex
#2It's exciting that many can build useful things today. I'm a little existentially upset that I'm not so special anymore though.
Re: Sites and role specific plugins in Codex
#3Re: Sites and role specific plugins in Codex
#4Re: Sites and role specific plugins in Codex
#5Re: Sites and role specific plugins in Codex
#6It's an extreme example of not building on someone else's platform only now the platform is all codebases ever existing...
Re: Sites and role specific plugins in Codex
#7The SaaSpocalypse is upon us. When the model maker also vertically integrates into the use cases as well, I'm not sure what's left, besides maybe banding together to make collectively owned open weight models in order to compete. It's an extreme example of not building on someone else's platform only now the platform is all codebases ever existing...
Will OpenAI with dozens of “verticals” be as good as a vertical focused SaaS?
They can ship a CRM/iPaaS/tables, but will they be better than Salesforce/Zapier/Airtable?
I don’t think so, I think it’ll just end up as bloat.
Re: Sites and role specific plugins in Codex
#8The SaaSpocalypse is upon us. When the model maker also vertically integrates into the use cases as well, I'm not sure what's left, besides maybe banding together to make collectively owned open weight models in order to compete. It's an extreme example of not building on someone else's platform only now the platform is all codebases ever existing...
I’m not so sure. Focus still matters. Will OpenAI with dozens of “verticals” be as good as a vertical focused SaaS? They can ship a CRM/iPaaS/tables, but will they be better than Salesforce/Zapier/Airtable? I don’t think so, I think it’ll just end up as bloat.